Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Elimination of the Unwanted Image in Diffraction Microscopy

Abstract

DURING a discussion at Cambridge, the idea was put forward that it might be possible to eliminate the effects of the unwanted image in diffraction microscopy by taking a subsidiary hologram and subtracting it from the reconstruction. In Gabor's method1,2 a single hologram is used, and he has shown how two images are formed, when coherent light traverses this hologram, so that the image in sharp focus has as a background a confused pattern due to the other image. In a recent note in Nature3, an elementary explanation of the origin of these two images is given; the confusion they cause is the necessary price paid for the loss of information as to the phase of the disturbance in the plane in which the main hologram is taken. But in a coherent beam, if the amplitude and phase are known over a surface 1, they can be calculated over a subsequent surface 2 by Huyghens's principle. In general, the two patterns differ from one another, yet they both contain essentially the same information. This opens up the possibility that the confusion due to loss of information about phase in one plane, the main hologram plane, may be cleared up by measuring the amplitude in another plane which we call that of the auxiliary hologram. In other words, two suitably separated amplitude patterns will do service for a single pattern giving both amplitude and phase. While one hologram gives two images, two holograms can be made to give one image.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gabor, D., Nature, 161, 777 (1948).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gabor, D., Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 197, 454 (1949).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bragg, W. L., Nature, 166, 399 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haine, M. E., and Dyson, J., Nature, 166, 315 (1950).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers, G. L., Nature, 166, 237 (1950).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers, G. L., Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BRAGG, W., ROGERS, G. Elimination of the Unwanted Image in Diffraction Microscopy. Nature 167, 190–191 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1038/167190a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/167190a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing