Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Energy intake in Swedish adolescents: validation of diet history with doubly labelled water

Abstract

Objective: To compare habitual energy intake (EI) estimated from diet history (DH) with total energy expenditure (TEE) measured with doubly labelled water (DLW) in adolescents.

Design: DH included a detailed questionnaire and an interview. TEE was measured during a 14-day period. Adequate (AR), under- (UR) and over-reporters (OR) were defined from the ratio EI/TEE: AR 0.84–1.16, UR <0.84 and OR >1.16.

Setting: Participants were recruited from grade 9 in a compulsory school in Göteborg, Sweden. All data were collected at school and DLW dosages were distributed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital.

Subjects: A total of 35 adolescents (18 boys, 17 girls), 15.7 (0.4) y.

Results: EI was 11.0 (3.6) MJ and TEE was 11.4 (2.1) MJ (P=0.42). DH was able to rank EI compared to TEE (Spearman's r=0.59, P0.001). For girls, EI was 18% lower (P=0.0067) and for boys, EI was 7% higher (P=0.26) compared to TEE. The 95% limits of agreement for difference between TEE and EI were −5.6 to 6.5 MJ. In total, 20 subjects were defined as AR (57%), nine as UR (26%) and six as OR (17%). Energy from in-between meals was 33% lower (P=0.0043) in UR girls and 57% higher (P=0.026) in OR boys, compared to adequate reporting girls and boys, respectively. In UR girls, energy-adjusted intake (10 MJ) of specific foods did not differ significantly, fat was lower and carbohydrate and vitamin C were higher compared to AR girls (all P<0.05). OR boys had no significant differences in food and nutrient intake in 10 MJ compared to AR boys.

Conclusion: The diet history was able to capture EI for the group and to rank subjects. There was a wide individual range in reporting- accuracy related to gender.

Sponsorship: The Ingabritt and Arne Lundberg Foundation, The Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen LF, Tomten H, Haggarty P, Lovo A & Hustvedt BE (2003): Validation of energy intake estimated from a food frequency questionnaire: a doubly labelled water study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 57, 279–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandini LG, Schoeller DA, Cyr HN & Dietz WH (1990): Validity of reported energy intake in obese and nonobese adolescents. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 52, 421–425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham S (1987): The dietary assessment of individuals: methods, accuracy, new techniques and recommendations. Nutr. Abst. Rev. 57, 705–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black AE & Cole TJ (2000): Within- and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water technique: implications for validating reported dietary energy intake. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 54, 386–394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black AE, Welch AA & Bingham SA (2000): Validation of dietary intakes measured by diet history against 24 h urinary nitrogen excretion and energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water method in middle-aged women. Br. J. Nutr. 83, 341–354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bland JM & Altman DG (1986): Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braam LA, Ocke MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB & Seidell JC (1998): Determinants of obesity-related underreporting of energy intake. Am. J. Epidemiol. 147, 1081–1086.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bratteby LE, Sandhagen B, Fan H, Enghardt H & Samuelson G (1998): Total energy expenditure and physical activity as assessed by the doubly labeled water method in Swedish adolescents in whom energy intake was underestimated by 7-d diet records. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 67, 905–911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM & Dietz WH (2000): Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 320, 1240–1243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg GR & Black AE (1998): Assessment of the validity of reported energy intakes - review and recent developments. Scand. J. Nutr./Näringsforskning 42, 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Murgatroyd PR, Coward WA & Prentice AM (1991): Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 45, 569–581.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goris AH & Westerterp KR (1999): Underreporting of habitual food intake is explained by undereating in highly motivated lean women. J. Nutr. 129, 878–882.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert JR, Ebbeling CB, Matthews CE, Hurley TG, Ma Y, Druker S & Clemow L (2002): Systematic errors in middle-aged women's estimates of energy intake: comparing three self-report measures to total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water. Ann. Epidemiol. 12, 577–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert JR, Ma Y, Clemow L, Ockene IS, Saperia G, Stanek III EJ, Merriam PA & Ockene JK (1997): Gender differences in social desirability and social approval bias in dietary self-report. Am. J. Epidemiol. 146, 1046–1055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RJ & Davies PS (1999): The validity of a four day weighed food record for measuring energy intake in female classical ballet dancers. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53, 752–753.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirvonen T, Mannisto S, Roos E & Pietinen P (1997): Increasing prevalence of underreporting does not necessarily distort dietary surveys. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 51, 297–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulthén L, Hallberg L, Albertsson-Wikland K, Bondestam M, Ekblom B, Höglund D, Lindstedt G, Sjöberg A & Slinde F (2003): Height and weight in two representative samples of Swedish adolescents. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. (in press).

  • IDECG (1990): The Doubly-labelled Water Method for Measuring energy Expenditure. Technical Recommendations for use in Humans. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

  • Johansson L, Solvoll K, Bjorneboe GE & Drevon CA (1998): Under- and overreporting of energy intake related to weight status and lifestyle in a nationwide sample. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68, 266–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kretsch MJ, Fong AK & Green MW (1999): Behavioral and body size correlates of energy intake underreporting by obese and normal-weight women. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 99, 300–306: quiz 307–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone MB & Black AE (2003): Markers of the validity of reported energy intake. J. Nutr. 133(Suppl 3), 895S–920S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone MB, Prentice AM, Coward WA, Strain JJ, Black AE, Davies PS, Stewart CM, McKenna PG & Whitehead RG (1992): Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 56, 29–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone MB & Robson PJ (2000): Measurement of dietary intake in children. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 59, 279–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perks SM, Roemmich JN, Sandow-Pajewski M, Clark PA, Thomas E, Weltman A, Patrie J & Rogol AD (2000): Alterations in growth and body composition during puberty. IV. Energy intake estimated by the youth-adolescent food-frequency questionnaire: validation by the doubly labeled water method. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72, 1455–1460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerleau J, Ostbye T & Bright-See E (1999): Potential underreporting of energy intake in the Ontario Health Survey and its relationship with nutrient and food intakes. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 15, 553–557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poppitt SD, Swann D, Black AE & Prentice AM (1998): Assessment of selective under-reporting of food intake by both obese and non-obese women in a metabolic facility. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 22, 303–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield WN (1985): Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum. Nutr. Clin. Nutr. 39, 5–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg A, Hallberg L, Höglund D & Hulthén L (2003): Meal pattern, food choice, nutrient intake and lifestyle factors in The Göteborg Adolescence Study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 57, 1569–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slinde F, Ellegård L, Grönberg AM, Larsson S & Rossander-Hulthén L (2003): Total energy expenditure in underweight patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease living at home. Clin. Nutr. 22, 159–165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stallone DD, Brunner EJ, Bingham SA & Marmot MG (1997): Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: the influence of reporting bias on apparent socioeconomic variation in nutrient intakes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 51, 815–825.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swedish National Food Administration (1996): The Food Composition Table - Energy and Nutrients. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish National Food Administration.

  • Weber JL, Reid PM, Greaves KA, DeLany JP, Stanford VA, Going SB, Howell WH & Houtkooper LB (2001): Validity of self-reported energy intake in lean and obese young women, using two nutrient databases, compared with total energy expenditure assessed by doubly labeled water. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 55, 940–950.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerterp KR, Donkers JH, Fredrix EW & Boekhoudt P (1995): Energy intake, physical activity and body weight: a simulation model. Br. J. Nutr. 73, 337–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worsley A, Baghurst KI & Leitch DR (1984): Social desirability response bias and dietary inventory responses. Hum. Nutr. Appl. Nutr. 38, 29–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all subjects for their cooperation and Mrs Annica Alklind for performing the anthropometric measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Sjöberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sjöberg, A., Slinde, F., Arvidsson, D. et al. Energy intake in Swedish adolescents: validation of diet history with doubly labelled water. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 1643–1652 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601892

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601892

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links