Correction to: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2003) 57, 455–463. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601563

The Publishers would like to apologise for the following typographical error that occurred in the above paper during typesetting. On page 458, under the sub-heading ‘Sensitivity and specificity’, the first line should have read:

The classification into AR, UR and OR

Table 4 was also reproduced incorrectly. The correct version is shown below:

Table 4 Logistic regression model of bone mineral content at distal one-third ulna of Beijing girls aged 12–14y (n=380)a