INTRODUCTION

Striatal cholinergic signaling is considered to play a central role in motor control as well as in the pathophysiology of different movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease, Huntington's chorea, dystonia, and most recently in progressive supranuclear palsy (Lehmann and Langer, 1983; Albin et al, 2003; Saulle et al, 2004; Warren et al, 2005). Cholinergic interneurons account for a small proportion of the entire striatal neuronal population. In spite of this, the striatum is one of the brain areas with the highest acetylcholine content (Izzo and Bolam, 1988). Cholinergic interneurons receive glutamatergic afferents predominantly from the centromedian and parafascicular thalamic nuclei, and to a lesser extent from the cortex. They are also recipient of a crucial dopaminergic innervation from the substantia nigra pars compacta, and of GABAergic afferents from striatal interneurons. Each of these transmitters has been shown to profoundly modulate both the intrinsic excitability and the synaptic efficacy and plasticity of these interneurons (Yan et al, 1997; Yan and Surmeier, 1997; Aosaki et al, 1998; Suzuki et al, 2001; Pisani et al, 2000; Bonsi et al, 2004, 2005; Maurice et al, 2004).

The basal ganglia in primates receive a significant serotonergic input from the anterior raphe nuclei, although the densities and patterns of innervation vary (Lavoie and Parent, 1990). The ventral striatum is particularly enriched in serotonergic terminals, that are also substantial in the dorsal striatum. Growing evidence indicates that the striatal serotonergic innervation contributes to motor function. In Parkinson's disease, striatal levels of 5-HT fall in parallel with those of dopamine, potentially contributing to motor and affective symptoms (Halliday et al, 1990; Sandyk and Fisher, 1988). Moreover, selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, widely used to treat depression, have been reported to induce a variety of movement disorder, including tremor, parkinsonism, and dystonia (Leo, 1996; Caley, 1997).

In spite of its clinical importance, little attention has been paid in understanding how 5-HT regulates the activity of identified striatal cell types, like the cholinergic interneuron (cf. Park et al, 1982; Yakel et al, 1988; Stefani et al, 1990). Our study was designed to analyze the effects of 5-HT on intrinsic membrane properties of cholinergic interneurons and to unravel the receptor subtypes and ionic mechanisms involved. To accomplish this, we utilized a combination of pharmacological, electrophysiological, and molecular approaches. Our results suggest that 5-HT activates 5-HT2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 receptors, leading to increased excitability of cholinergic interneurons mainly by acting on K+ currents. This modulatory activity is likely contributing to shape interneuron excitability and influence the overall striatal output.

METHODS

Tissue Preparation

The animal experimental protocols performed in this study were in accordance to the guidelines of the European Union Council (86/609/EU) and to the Animal Act (1986). All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and the number of animals utilized. Male Wistar rats, 3–4 weeks old, were anesthetized and killed by cervical dislocation. After rapid removal of the brain from the skull, corticostriatal coronal slices (180–200 μm) were prepared from tissue blocks with the use of a vibratome in oxygenated Krebs' solution (see composition below) (Pisani et al, 2000; Bonsi et al, 2004, 2005). After 30–60 min recovery, a single slice was transferred into a recording chamber (0.5–1 ml volume) mounted on the stage of an upright microscope (BX51WI, Olympus, Milan, Italy) equipped with a 20 × , 0.95 n.a. water immersion objective (XLUMPlan Fl, Olympus), and submerged in a continuously flowing (2–3 ml/min) solution at 32–33°C gassed with 95% O2/5% CO2. At this flow rate, chemicals reached the chamber within 30–50 s. The composition of the solution was (in mM): 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.3 MgCl2, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 2.4 CaCl2, 10 glucose, 18 NaHCO3.

DIC Infrared Videomicroscopy

Individual interneurons were visualized in situ using a differential interference contrast (DIC, Nomarski) optical system combined with an infrared (IR) filter and a monochrome CCD camera (C6790, Hamamatsu, Japan). Cholinergic interneurons were impaled under visual guidance, according to their peculiar shape and size, up to 100 μm beneath the slice surface.

Electrophysiological Recordings

Intracellular sharp microelectrode filled with 2 M KCl were used for current clamp recordings. The signal was acquired by an Axoclamp 2B amplifier (Axon Instruments). The traces were displayed on an oscilloscope (Gould Classic 6000), acquired, stored, and analyzed off-line by pClamp 9 software (Axon Instruments). During current-clamp experiments, the effect of 5-HT on membrane properties was determined after adjusting the membrane potential back to the resting value by injecting hyperpolarizing current into the recorded cell. Whole-cell patch clamp recordings were made with borosilicate glass pipettes (1.8 mm o.d.; 3–5 MΩ) containing (mM) K+-gluconate (125), NaCl (10), CaCl2, (1.0), MgCl2 (2.0), 1,2-bis (2-aminophenoxy) ethane-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA; 0.5), N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazine-N-s-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES; 19), guanosine triphosphate (GTP; 0.3), Mg-adenosine triphosphate (Mg-ATP; 1.0), adjusted to pH 7.3 with KOH. Membrane currents were monitored using an Axopatch 1D patch-clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Interneurons were voltage-clamped at −60 mV. Voltage ramps and digital subtractions of the resulting currents were obtained by using pClamp 9 software. Voltage ramps (from −120 to −40 mV, 6 mV/s) were preceded by a clamp at −120 mV for 2 s to allow Ih currents to develop. The instantaneous current response to the voltage step (before development of Ih currents) was used to estimate input resistance of the interneurons. Neurons in which series resistance (8–25 MΩ) changed by more than 10% during 5-HT application were discarded from the statistics.

Values given in the text and in the figures are mean±SEM of changes in the respective cell populations. Nonparametric Wilcoxon matched pairs and Mann–Whitney test were used to compare the means.

Drug Source and Handling

Ketanserin, RS23597-190, SB 258585, ZD7288, chelerythrine, CNQX, D-APV, bicuculline, SB 269970, RS 102221, 5-carboxamidotryptamine maleate (5-CT), isamoltane hemifumarate were from Tocris Cookson (Bristol, UK); tetrodotoxin (TTX), serotonin, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), SQ22,536, calphostin C, tropisetron, barium chloride, and cesium chloride were from Sigma (Milan, Italy). Drugs were applied by dissolving them to the final concentration in the saline and by switching the perfusion from control saline to drug-containing saline, after a three ways tap had been turned on.

Single-Cell RT-PCR Analysis

Neurons were harvested using patch electrodes that had been baked at 200°C for 2 h before use. Sterile gloves were worn during the entire procedure to minimize RNase contamination. Electrodes contained 2.0 μl of pipet solution or 1.64 μl diethyl carbonate-treated water, 0.2 μl 10 × RT buffer, 0.08 μl MgCl2 (25 mM), and 0.08 μl RNaseOUT (40 U/μl). All components were from Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System (RT-PCR Kit #18080-051, Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Following aspiration, the tip of the electrode was broken and the contents ejected into a sterile Eppendorf tube containing 1.4 μl diethyl carbonate-treated water, 0.5 μl MgCl2 (25 mM), 1.0 μl mixed dNTPs (10 mM), 0.7 μl RNaseOUT (40 U/μl), 0.7 μl BSA (143 μg/μl), 0.7 μl oligo-dT (0.5 μg/μl), and 1.0 μl random hexamers (50 ng/μl). Single strand cDNA was synthesized from cellular mRNAs by heating the mixture to 65°C for 5 min, then cooling on ice for 1 min; then a mixture containing 1.0 μl 10 × RT buffer, 1.5 μl MgCl2 (25 mM), 1.0 μl DTT (0.1 M), 0.5 μl RNaseOut (40 U/μl) and 1.0 μl Superscript III Reverse Transcriptase (200 U/μl) were added; the mixture was then incubated for 10 min at 25°C for primer binding; the reaction mixture was then held at 50°C for 1 h and 30 min to promote cDNA synthesis; the reaction was terminated by heating to 85°C for 5 min and then snap cooling 0°C; lastly, RNase H (1 μl, 2 U/μl) was added and the mixture incubated at 37°C for 20 min to remove the RNA strand from RNA–cDNA hybrids. cDNAs were amplified by PCR using primers developed from GenBank sequences using commercially available software (OLIGO, National Biosciences, Plymouth, MN). Primers for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and the 67 kDa isoform of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD67) have been described previously (Tkatch et al, 1998). The 5-HT1a mRNA (Genbank NM_008308) was detected with a pair of primers: upper primer CCAAGAAGAGCCTGAATGGT, lower primer TGGCAACTGCTCTCACAGAAA. The predicted PCR product length was 379 bp. The 5-HT2a mRNA (Genbank M30705) was detected with a pair of primers: upper primer TCGAGCCAAACTAGCCTCCTTCA, lower primer TTCTGTCCCACCTGGAGCTGACTA. The predicted PCR product length was 465 bp. The 5-HT2C mRNA (Genbank, M21410) was detected with a pair of primers: upper primer GCCGTCAAACTCTGATGTTACTTC, lower primer ACGTTCATTGGTATGCCGATAA. The predicted PCR product length was 545 bp. The 5-HT6 mRNA (Genbank, NM_021358) was detected with a pair of primers: upper primer TTGTGGCCAGCATAGCTCAG, lower primer CCGGGTCGCCTCTCCAG. The predicted PCR product length was 343 bp. The 5-HT7 mRNA (Genbank, NM_ L19654) was detected with a pair of primers: upper primer GGTGGAAGAGTGTGCGAACCTTTC, lower primer CGGGCCTCTCAGCAAGTTTCAG. The predicted PCR product length was 383 bp. Standard methods were employed for PCR product detection. The negative controls for contamination from extraneous and genomic DNA were run for every batch of neurons. Both controls were consistently negative in these experiments.

RESULTS

Identification of the Recorded Neurons

Physiological data were obtained from 224 neurons. Large, aspiny cholinergic interneurons were visualized with IR-DIC videomicroscopy (up to 100 μm beneath the surface) in striatal slices (Figure 1a). The electrophysiological properties of these neurons confirmed the morphological identification (Figure 1b–d) (Kawaguchi, 1993; Bennett and Wilson, 1999; Pisani et al, 2000). The recorded neurons had a mean resting membrane potentials of −60.3±0.9 mV and a high input resistance (120.0±12.8 MΩ, in intracellular sharp recordings; 78.5±3.7 MΩ in the whole-cell configuration). Action potential firing showed strong accomodation and was followed by a long-lasting after hyperpolarization (AHP; 345±108 ms duration) (Figure 1b and c). Hyperpolarizing current pulses evoked a prominent voltage sag, characteristic of an Ih current (Figure 1b and d) (Jiang and North, 1991; Kawaguchi, 1993). All neurons included in this study showed these properties. Moreover, nearly half of the neurons displayed spontaneous spiking.

Figure 1
figure 1

Morphological and electrophysiological features of striatal cholinergic interneurons. (a) DIC image of a cholinergic interneuron in a striatal slice showing a large sized, polygonal soma bearing two to three dendrites, peculiar features of this class of striatal cells. (b) In a representative recording, a short pulse of positive current (200 pA, 600 ms) induced a train of action potentials showing a strong accommodation. Note the pronounced AHP following the depolarizing step. In the same recording, injection of negative current (800 pA, 600 ms) induced a typical sag in the membrane response, indicating a strong Ih. RMP=−57 mV. (c) By injecting a higher amount of positive current for longer duration (500 pA, 1.3 s) both firing accommodation and AHP were more evident. RMP=−66 mV. (d) A prolonged pulse of negative current induced a strong time-dependent Ih. RMP=−58 mV.

5-HT-Induced Depolarization of Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons

In the current-clamp condition, bath application of 5-HT (0.3–300 μM) consistently depolarized interneurons and increased firing frequency (Figure 2a). The calculated mean frequency at rest was 1.8±0.2 Hz. Bath application of 5-HT (10 μM, 30 s) caused a more than two-fold increase in the mean firing rate (4.7±0.4 Hz; 261±22% of control; n=5; p<0.01). The depolarizing response to 5-HT was still observed in the presence of TTX (1 μM), arguing that voltage-gated Na+ channels were not obligatory targets of the modulation (Figure 2b; n=47). In addition, CNQX, APV (10 μM, n=3 and 50 μM, n=4, respectively), and bicuculline (30 μM, n=3)—blockers of ionotropic glutamate receptors and GABAA receptors—failed to alter the effect of 5-HT (not shown; p>0.05). Taken together, these observations indicate that 5-HT was acting at postsynaptic sites. The dose–response curve for the 5-HT-induced depolarizing effect reached a plateau at 50 μM (Figure 2c; Table 1), and was fitted by a logistic equation from which an EC50 value of 6.5±2.3 μM was calculated (Figure 2c; n=10).

Figure 2
figure 2

5-HT excites striatal cholinergic interneurons. (a1) In a spontaneously firing cholinergic interneuron, bath application of 5-HT (10 μM, 30 s) induced a membrane depolarization and increased the frequency of action potential discharge (shown at higher sweep speed in (a2): pre- and (a3): post-5-HT). (a4) Timecourse of the 5-HT-induced increase in discharge rate. RMP=−50 mV. (b) In another representative recording, in the presence of TTX (1 μM) the 5-HT-induced (50 μM, 30 s) membrane depolarization was still observed. RMP=−68 mV. (c) Dose–response curve of the 5-HT-induced membrane depolarization, in the presence of TTX. The EC50 calculated from this curve was 6.75±2.29 μM.

Table 1 Summary of the Pharmacological Characterization of the Serotonergic Effects on Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons

5-HT Receptor Classes Involved in the Serotonergic Excitatory Response

5-HT2 receptors are abundant in the striatum (Cassel and Jeltsch, 1995). The involvement of this class of receptors in the 5-HT-induced response of cholinergic interneurons was addressed by applying the 5-HT2 antagonist ketanserin in the bath. In the presence of TTX, ketanserin (10–30 μM; 10–15 min preincubation) reversibly reduced the amplitude of the membrane depolarization induced by 5-HT (50 μM). The inhibitory effect observed with 10 and 30 μM ketanserin were not statistically different and therefore data were pooled (Figure 3a, Table 1; 53.8±3.3% of control; n=14; p<0.05). In line with these results, the selective 5-HT2 agonist DOI (20 μM, 3 min) induced a reversible membrane depolarization in the presence of TTX (Figure 3b1, Table 1; 3.4±0.5 mV; n=10; p<0.01). The depolarizing response induced by DOI (20 μM, 3 min) was prevented by pretreatment with ketanserin (10 μM, 10–15 min preincubation; Figure 3b2; 9.1±0.5% of control; n=6; p<0.01). In order to discriminate between 5-HT2 receptor subtypes, the effect of the selective 5-HT2C antagonist RS 102221 was tested on the 5-HT-induced response (Xiang et al, 2005). Pretreatment with RS 102221 (1–3 μM, 10–15 min) caused a significant reduction in the depolarization produced by 50 μM 5-HT (Figure 3c, Table 1; 3 μM: 66.9±1.3% of control; n=4; p<0.05); addition of 10 μM ketanserin did not cause further inhibitory effect (Figure 3c4; n=3; p>0.05). These data indicate the involvement of 5-HT2C, but not 5-HT2A, receptor subtype in the 5-HT-induced depolarization of cholinergic interneurons.

Figure 3
figure 3

The serotonergic excitation of cholinergic interneurons involves 5-HT2C receptor activation. (a1) In a representative recording from a cholinergic interneuron, in the presence of TTX, bath application of 5-HT (black bar; 50 μM, 30 s) induced a membrane depolarization. Downward deflections represent the voltage response to hyperpolarizing current steps (200 pA, 1.5 s). (a2) Pretreatment with the 5-HT2 antagonist ketanserin (30 μM, 15 min) reduced the amplitude of the 5-HT-induced membrane depolarization. RMP=−67 mV. (b1) Bath-application of the 5-HT2 agonist DOI (20 μM, 3 min) mimicked the 5-HT-induced membrane depolarization. (b2) Preincubation in ketanserin abolished the DOI response. RMP=−60 mV. (c) Representative recording showing the inhibitory effect of the selective 5-HT2C antagonist RS 102221 (c2: 1 μM, c3: 3 μM, 15 min) on the 5-HT depolarization (c1). (c4) Addition of ketanserin (10 μM) did not cause further inhibitory effect. RMP=−65 mV.

Among other 5-HT receptor subtypes, 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 are expressed within the striatum (Blandina et al, 1989; Jakeman et al, 1994; Waeber et al, 1994; Patel et al, 1995; Gerald et al, 1995). Thus, in another set of experiments selective drugs acting both at 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 receptors were tested. Tropisetron (10 μM, 10 min), a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, failed to alter the membrane depolarization/inward current caused by 5-HT (Table 1; n=5; p>0.05). The 5-HT4 receptor antagonist RS 23597-190 (25 μM) was applied in the perfusion solution 10–15 min before 5-HT (50 μM, 30 s) application. Pretreatment with RS 23597-190 did not significantly affect the amplitude of the 5-HT-induced membrane depolarization, thus ruling out an involvement of 5-HT4 receptors in the serotonergic excitation of cholinergic interneurons (Figure 4a, Table 1; 96.1±2.9% of control; n=7; p>0.05).

Figure 4
figure 4

The 5-HT-induced depolarization is reduced by the selective 5-HT6 receptor antagonist SB 258585, but not by 5-HT4 receptor blockade. (a1) In a representative recording from a cholinergic interneuron, 50 μM 5-HT (black bar; 30 s) induced a membrane depolarization. (a2) Preincubation with the selective 5-HT4 antagonist RS 23597-190 (25 μM, 15 min) did not significantly modify the amplitude of the 5-HT-induced membrane depolarization. RMP=−65 mV. (b) Another recording showing the inhibitory effect of the selective 5-HT6 antagonist SB 258585 on the 5-HT-induced (black bar, 50 μM, 35 s) membrane depolarization in a cholinergic interneuron. The downward deflections represent the membrane response to current pulses (100 pA, 1.5 s), applied to evaluate the membrane resistance. (b2) After 15 min pretreatment with the 5-HT6 receptor antagonist SB 258585 (10 μM) the amplitude of 5-HT-induced depolarization was significantly reduced. RMP=−59 mV.

Another 5-HT receptor expressed at significant levels in the striatum is the 5-HT6 receptor (Ruat et al, 1993; Ward and Dorsa, 1996; Gerard et al, 1997). The involvement of these receptors was assessed by using the selective antagonist SB 258585. Pretreatment with SB 258585 (1–30 μM) dose-dependently reduced the 5-HT-induced (50 μM) membrane depolarization (1 μM: 75.1±2.8%; 3 μM: 62.6±2.1; 10 μM: 49.5±3.7%; 30 μM: 53.9±2.9 of control, respectively; n=9; p<0.01), with a maximal inhibition observed at 10 μM (Figure 4b, Table 1). These observations indicate that 5-HT6 receptors contribute to the excitatory effect of 5-HT on cholinergic interneurons.

5-HT7 receptor expression level has been previously reported to be low in the rat striatum (Vizuete et al, 1997; Hoyer et al, 2002). We tested the effect of the selective 5-HT7 receptor antagonist SB 269970 (1–3 μM, 20–25 min) on the 5-HT-induced depolarizing response (Chapin and Andrade, 2001). SB 269970 showed a significant inhibitory effect on the depolarization induced by 5-HT (50 μM, 30 s) in striatal cholinergic interneurons (Figure 5a, Table 1; 17.7±7% of control; n=7; p<0.05). Accordingly, 5-CT (agonist at 5-HT1 and 5-HT7 receptors; 10 μM, 1 min) induced a membrane depolarization, that was unaffected by preincubation of the slice with isamoltane (1 μM), selective 5-HT1B antagonist (Table 1; 6.2±0.7 mV; n=5; p<0.01). The 5-CT-induced membrane response was slightly reduced by addition of ketanserin and SB 258585 (both 10 μM) (Figure 5b2; 70.1±2.2% of control; n=4; p>0.05). Further addition of 3 μM SB 269970 completely abolished the 5-CT-induced response (Figure 5b3; 7.0±1.2% of control; n=4; p<0.05).

Figure 5
figure 5

5-HT7 receptor contributes to the 5-HT effect on cholinergic interneurons. (a2) Representative trace showing the strong inhibitory effect of the selective 5-HT7 antagonist SB 269970 (1 μM, 25 min) on the 5-HT-induced (black bar, 50 μM, 35 s) depolarization of cholinergic interneurons. (a3) Note that increasing the concentration of SB 269970 to 3 μM did not exert further inhibitory effect. RMP=−54 mV. (b1–b3) In the presence of the 5-HT1 antagonist isamoltane (1 μM, 15 min), the 5-HT1 and 5-HT7 agonist 5-CT (black bar, 10 μM, 1 min) induced a depolarizing response in the recorded cholinergic interneuron. The downward deflections represent the voltage response to current pulses (100 pA, 1.5 s). (b2) Addition of 10 μM ketanserin and 10 μM SB 258585 did not cause significant inhibitory effect. (b3) The selective 5-HT7 antagonist SB 269970 (1 μM) completely blocked the 5-CT-induced depolarizing effect. RMP=−63 mV.

The depolarizing response induced by 5-HT (50 μM, 30 s) was abolished by coapplication of RS 102221, SB 258585, and SB 269970 (Figure 6a4; 14.5±3.2% of control; n=3; p<0.05), thus confirming the involvement of 5-HT2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 receptors in the serotonergic excitation of striatal cholinergic interneurons.

Figure 6
figure 6

The 5-HT-induced depolarization of striatal cholinergic interneurons is mediated by 5-HT2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 receptors. (a4) Representative recording showing that only coadministration of the selective antagonists at 5-HT2C receptor, 3 μM RS 102221, 5-HT6 receptor, 10 μM SB 258585, and 5-HT7 receptor, 1 μM SB 269970, completely blocked the 5-HT-induced membrane depolarization (a1, black bar, 50 μM, 35 s). RMP=−63 mV.

Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons Express 5-HT2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 Receptors

The pharmacological data suggest that 5-HT2C, 5-HT6, 5-HT7 receptors are involved in the serotonergic response. Previous studies have reported the expression of almost all 5-HT receptor subtypes in the striatum (Blandina et al, 1989; Jakeman et al, 1994; Waeber et al, 1994; Bruinvels et al, 1994; Patel et al, 1995; Gerald et al, 1995; Ward and Dorsa, 1996). However, the 5-HT receptors expressed by striatal cholinergic interneurons are unknown. To answer this question, single-cell RT-PCR (scRT-PCR) profiling was performed for 5-HT receptor mRNAs. Neurons were identified by their expression of choline acetyltransferase mRNA. Accordingly, they were negative for both substance P and enkephalin mRNA expression. Neurons were profiled for their expression of 5-HT1, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 receptor mRNAs (Figure 7). 5-HT2C (16/21) and 5-HT6 (11/21) receptor mRNAs were readily detected in striatal cholinergic interneurons. On the other hand, 5-HT1 class transcripts were only detected in less than a third (7/21) of the neurons and 5-HT2A mRNA was only detected once (1/21). The 5-HT7 receptor detection rate was high (11/15). Figure 7b summarizes the detection frequencies of 5-HT receptor subtype mRNA in cholinergic interneurons.

Figure 7
figure 7

scRT-PCR of acutely isolated cholinergic interneuron revealed high expression of 5-HT2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 mRNAs. (a) Ethidium bromide-stained gels showing scRT-PCR profiles of typical interneurons, identified by ChAT staining (top) and absence of enkephalin and substance P staining (bottom). The upper gel shows a neuron coexpressing 5-HT2c and 5-HT6 mRNAs. The lower gel shows a cell with detectable 5-HT7 mRNA. (b) Summary of detection percentages for each mRNA in a sample of 36 cholinergic interneurons.

Endogenous Serotonergic Tone in the Striatum

To address the possibility of an endogenous 5-HT tone in the striatum, the effect of 5-HT reuptake inhibitors was tested on cholinergic interneurons in our slice preparation. In the current-clamp mode, bath application of fluvoxamine (30 μM, 3 min) induced a small, but significant membrane depolarization in the recorded cells (Figure 8a; 2.9±0.3 mV; n=5; p<0.01). In spontaneously firing neurons the membrane depolarization was coupled to an increase in the frequency of action potentials (Figure 8a). Bath-application of a more selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, citalopram (30 μM, 4 min), induced a similar membrane depolarization (Figure 8b; 3.4±0.5 mV; n=18), and increased the firing rate of the recorded interneurons (178.1±11.1% of control; p<0.01).

Figure 8
figure 8

Endogenous serotonergic tone in the striatum. (a) Representative trace of a recording from a spontaneously firing cholinergic interneuron. Inhibition of the 5-HT reuptake by fluvoxamine (black bar, 10 μM, 2 min) slightly depolarized the cell and increased firing frequency. RMP=−59 mV. (b) A similar effect was observed using the highly selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor citalopram (black bar, 30 μM, 4 min). RMP=−65 mV. (c) Ketanserin (10 μM, 10 min) was able to significantly reduce the membrane depolarization and the increase in action potential firing induced by bath application of citalopram. The train of action potentials shown in (c2) was induced by injection of a current pulse. RMP=−61 mV. (d) After pretreatment with SB 258585 (10 μM, 15 min), the citalopram-induced depolarization and firing frequency increase were significantly reduced. RMP=−68 mV. (e) In another spontaneously firing neuron, SB 269970 (1 μM, 20 min) significantly reduced both the membrane depolarization and the increase in firing frequency induced by citalopram. RMP=−50 mV.

The contribution of 5-HT receptor subtypes to the response induced by inhibition of the reuptake was investigated pharmacologically by utilizing the selective 5-HT2, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 antagonists. Treatment with either antagonist, per se, reduced the frequency of spontaneous firing activity without affecting the membrane potential (Figure 8c–e). In agreement with our pharmacological characterization, the membrane depolarization induced by citalopram (30 μM, 4 min) was significantly reduced by preincubation with the 5-HT2 antagonist ketanserin (10 μM, 15 min) (Figure 8c; 79.9±4.8% of control; n=8; p<0.05) or the selective 5-HT2C antagonist RS 102221 (3 μM, 10–15 min) (not shown; n=3). Similarly, both the 5-HT6 antagonist SB 258585 (10 μM, 10–15 min) (Figure 8d; 71.2±4.2% of control; n=4; p<0.05) and the 5-HT7 antagonist SB 269970 (3 μM, 20 min) (Figure 8e; 68±3.7% of control; n=3; p<0.05) significantly reduced the membrane depolarization induced by citalopram. Accordingly, also the increase in firing frequency induced by citalopram was nearly abolished by any of the inhibitors (Figure 8).

Post-Receptor Transduction Pathway of the 5-HT Effects

5-HT6 and 5-HT7 receptors are positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase activation through Gs protein. Given the contribution of this receptor subtypes to the 5-HT-induced response, we tested for the involvement of adenylyl cyclase pathway in the 5-HT-induced depolarization. Pretreatment with the adenylyl cyclase inhibitor SQ22,536 (50 μM, 20 min) significantly reduced the 5-HT-induced membrane depolarization (Figure 9; 60.2±11.4% of control, n=6; p<0.05), thus confirming the involvement of adenylate cyclase. Elevations in cAMP lead to activation of protein kinase A (PKA). We therefore examined the involvement of PKA in the 5-HT response using the PKA inhibitor, H-89. Pretreatment of the slice with 10 μM H-89 did not significantly affect the amplitude of the depolarizing response to 5-HT (Figure 9; 101.6±6.9% of control, n=4; p>0.05). These results suggest that the response induced by 5-HT in cholinergic interneurons, similarly to what reported for the β1 adrenoceptor, involves, at least in part, a cAMP-, but not PKA-sensitive element (Pisani et al, 2003).

Figure 9
figure 9

5-HT post-receptor transduction pathway. Summary plot of the effects of the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, PLC, PKA, and PKC by, respectively, 300 μM SQ22,536, 10 μM U 73122, 10 μM H-89, 3 μM chelerythine or 1 μM calphostin C, on the 5-HT-induced membrane depolarization of striatal cholinergic interneurons.

5-HT receptors belonging to the 5-HT2 class are coupled to Gq proteins and phospholipase C (PLC) activation. To test the involvement of PLC, slices were preincubated with the PLC inhibitor U 73122 (10 μM, 15 min). This led to a significant reduction in the depolarizing response to bath application of 50 μM 5-HT (Figure 9; 59.6±4.9% of control, n=3; p<0.05). PLC activation leads to the production of diacylglycerol and the activation of protein kinase C (PKC). To test for PKC involvement, the inhibitors chelerythine (3 μM) and calphostin C (1 μM) were used. The 5-HT-induced membrane depolarization was not significantly affected by pretreatment of the slice with neither of the two PKC inhibitors (Figure 9; 96±2.6% of control; n=7; p>0.05).

Mechanisms of Serotonergic Excitation of Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons

To address the ionic mechanism mediating the depolarizing response to 5-HT, voltage-clamp recordings were performed in the whole-cell configuration in the presence of 1 μM TTX. A concentration of 30 μM 5-HT was used for all voltage-clamp experiments. With the somatic membrane potential clamped at −60 mV, 5-HT evoked an inward current (I5-HT) with an average amplitude of 85.2±6.1 pA (Figure 10a1, n=14). Slow voltage ramps from −120 mV to −40 mV (6 mV/s) were applied in the absence and presence of 5-HT. I5-HT was associated with a small increase in input resistance (104.9±1.6% of control; p<0.05). The reversal potential for I5-HT (E5-HT: −105.1±4.3 mV; Figure 10a2) was close to the K+ equilibrium potential (EK+: −102 mV) predicted by the Nernst equation. This finding suggests a main contribution of K+ currents in the response of striatal cholinergic interneurons to 5-HT. To test this possibility further, E5-HT was measured at a higher extracellular K+ concentration. An increase to 7.5 mM K+ caused a shift of E5-HT towards less negative values (−84.8±8.4 mV; Figure 10b; n=4), confirming that I5-HT is mediated by the closing of K+-selective ion channels.

Figure 10
figure 10

The 5-HT-induced inward current is mainly mediated by a potassium conductance. (a1) Representative trace of the inward current induced by 5-HT in voltage-clamped interneurons (holding potential −60 mV). The downward deflections represent voltage ramps (from −120 to −40 mV) applied before, during the maximal effect of 5-HT (30 μM), and at drug washout. (a2) Mean net 5-HT-induced current generated by digital subtraction from voltage ramps of 14 interneurons. A negative reversal potential of the 5-HT-induced current, close to the K+ equilibrium potential, is observed. (b) Mean net 5-HT-induced current obtained from digital subtraction of voltage ramps recorded in the presence of a higher extracellular K+ concentration (7.5 mM) from four interneurons. Note that the reversal potential is shifted to the right. (c) Mean net 5-HT-induced current generated by digital subtraction from voltage ramps recorded in the presence of high Ba2+ concentration (1 mM) from seven interneurons. (d1) Representative current response of interneurons to a hyperpolarizing voltage step from −60 to −120 mV (2 s). Ih amplitude was defined as the difference between the steady-state current at the end of the voltage step and the instantaneous current. Compared to control (1, black line), Ih is reduced in the presence of 5-HT (2, grey line). (d2) Mean net 5-HT-induced current generated by digital subtraction from voltage ramps recorded in the presence of either 25 μM ZD7288 (black line, n=7) or 3 mM Cs+ (grey line, n=7). In the presence of Cs+, the mean reversal potential of the net 5-HT-induced current is shifted to the right. For clarity, SEM is not shown for all data points.

The involvement of K+ conductance in the 5-HT action was also examined in a second series of experiments in which Ba2+ (1 mM) was included in the perfusion solution to block K+ channels. Extracellular Ba2+ increased input resistance (214.9±17.4% of control; n=7; p<0.001). In the presence of 1 mM Ba2+, 5-HT application caused a slight decrease in input resistance (90.7±3.3% of control; n=7; p<0.05) and the amplitude of I5-HT was significantly reduced (51.6±3.1 pA; not shown; p<0.01). Digital subtraction of the IV curves showed no reversal in the voltage range between −120 and −40 mV for the net 5-HT-induced current recorded in the presence of 1 mM Ba2+ (Figure 10c; n=7). The observed small decrease in input resistance and the absence of a reversal for the 5-HT-induced current in the voltage range examined suggest that, in addition to a reduction of K+ conductance, 5-HT may also act by opening cation channels in striatal cholinergic interneurons.

The HCN channels expressed by cholinergic interneurons are modulated by cytosolic cAMP, making them potential mediators of the response to G-protein coupled receptors positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase, like the 5-HT6 and 5-HT7 receptors. To determine whether 5-HT modulates Ih, we applied hyperpolarizing voltage steps (from −60 to −120 mV; 2 s). Ih was defined as the difference between the steady-state current at the end of the voltage step and the instantaneous current (Figure 10d1). Bath application of 5-HT slightly reduced Ih (Figure 10d1; 87.2±1.6% of control; p<0.01; n=10). Preincubation of slices with the HCN channel blocker ZD7288 (25 μM) abolished Ih (8.6±2.6% of control; not shown; n=7; p<0.01) and increased input resistance (133.0±10.2% of control; n=7; p<0.01) (Bennett et al, 2000; Wilson, 2005). After ZD7288 preincubation, 5-HT induced a small increase in input resistance (107±1.2% of control; n=7; p<0.01) and the 5-HT-induced current showed a reversal potential of −107.7±3.6 mV (Figure 10d2; n=7). In the presence of ZD7288, a significant reduction of I5-HT (37.0±7.7 pA; p<0.001; not shown) was observed. However, the possibility of aspecific effects of ZD7288 on this neuronal type should be considered (Wilson, 2005).

In another set of experiments Cs+ was used to block HCN channels. Cs+ has been reported to effectively reduce both Ih and inward rectifying K+ (Kir) currents (Bennett et al, 2000; Kjaerulff and Kiehn, 2001; Wilson, 2005). Preincubation of the slices with 3 mM Cs+ significantly reduced Ih (15.6±2.4% of control; not shown; n=8; p<0.05) and increased input resistance of the recorded cells (210±16% of control; n=8). In the presence of Cs+, 5-HT induced a significant increase in input resistance (148±14% of control; n=8; p<0.05) and the reversal of the 5-HT-induced current shifted to −88±2.6 mV (Figure 10d2). Preincubation of the slices with Cs+ did not significantly affect I5-HT (76.9±18.5 pA; not shown; p>0.05). The reversal potential of the Cs+-insensitive conductance suggests an involvement of K+ channels that are not blocked by Cs+ in the 5-HT-induced response.

In conclusion, these data show that closure of K+-selective channels primarily accounts for the inward current generated by 5-HT. Additional increase of cationic conductance may contribute to I5-HT. A concomitant slight reduction of Ih, however, might partly counteract these effects.

Distinct receptor subtypes mediate the depolarizing action of 5-HT in striatal cholinergic interneurons. In a further series of whole-cell patch-clamp experiments we investigated the effect of selective 5-HT2, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 receptor activation on ion conductance (Figure 11). Bathapplication of the 5-HT2 receptor agonist DOI (20 μM) induced an inward current in the recorded neurons (57.4±11.3 pA; not shown; n=4) and an increase in input resistance (107.4±4.7% of control; n=4; p<0.05). The net DOI-induced current, obtained by digital subtraction of the voltage ramps applied before and at the maximal effect of the agonist, showed a linear current–voltage relationship in the range between −120 and −70 mV, with a mean reversal potential of −79.4±2.4 mV (Figure 11b; n=7). These data suggest that closing of K+ channels is involved in the 5-HT2 receptor-induced inward current. To selectively activate 5-HT6 receptor, 30 μM 5-HT was applied after blockade of both 5-HT2C and 5-HT7 receptor with the selective antagonists RS 102221 and SB 269970 (3 μM each). 5-HT6 activation caused an increase in input resistance (108±1.7% of control; n=8; p<0.01) and induced an inward current of 46.4±7.7 pA (not shown). The digitally-subtracted current induced by 5-HT in the presence of RS 102221 and SB 269970 showed a linear current-voltage relationship, with a mean reversal potential of −91.7±3.7 mV (Figure 11c; n=8). These data are consistent with a major involvement of K+ conductance reduction in the inward current induced by 5-HT6 receptor activation. Bath-application of 10 μM 5-CT, the selective 5-HT7 receptor agonist, induced an inward current in the recorded neurons (87.9±4.7 pA; not shown; n=6). The absence of significant changes in input resistance (97.8±3.1%; n=6; p>0.05) and of a reversal potential for the net 5-CT-induced current in the voltage range examined (Figure 11d) suggests the simultaneous opening and closure of different channels. Interestingly, activation of either 5-HT2, 5-HT6 or 5-HT7 receptor induced a reduction of Ih (to 91.1±3.7%, 90.9±4.9%, and 94.3±3.4% of control, respectively), that did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05).

Figure 11
figure 11

Ion current induced by selective activation of 5-HT2C, 5-HT6 or 5-HT7 receptor subtype. (a–d) Mean net currents obtained by digital subtraction of voltage ramps delivered before and at the maximal effect of (a) 30 μM 5-HT, (b) the 5-HT2 agonist DOI (20 μM), (c) 30 μM 5-HT plus 5-HT2C and 5-HT7 antagonists, 3 μM RS102221 and 3 μM SB269970, respectively, (d) the 5-HT7 agonist 5-CT (10 μM). (b) From the net DOI-induced current a mean reversal potential of −79.4±2.4 mV was calculated (n=7). (c) In order to selectively activate 5-HT6 receptor, 5-HT was applied in the presence of 5-HT2C and 5-HT7 antagonists, RS102221 and SB269970, respectively. From the current–voltage curve, a mean reversal potential of −91.7±3.7 mV was calculated (n=8). (d) The current induced by 5-HT7 receptor agonist 5-CT did not show a reversal potential in the voltage range examined (n=6). For clarity, SEM is not shown for each data point.

DISCUSSION

Compelling evidence suggests that 5-HT modulates cholinergic signalling in several brain areas (Cassel and Jeltsch, 1995; Bourson et al, 1998). Depending upon the specific region involved, this functional interaction may powerfully influence cognitive functions as well as motor activity. In the present work, evidence is provided for a 5-HT-mediated excitatory influence on cholinergic interneurons of the striatum. This effect occurs through the activation of multiple receptor subtypes, namely 5-HT2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7, resulting in an inward current/membrane depolarization response. According to the transduction pathways linked to the receptor subtypes involved in the 5-HT-induced effect, the response of striatal cholinergic interneurons was partially blocked by either PLC or adenylyl cyclase inhibitors. In support of the pharmacological study, the PCR analysis confirmed the presence of 5-HT2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 receptors on cholinergic interneurons. Furthermore, an endogenous 5-HT effect was demonstrated. Blockade of either receptor subtype caused, per sè, a reduction in the action potential frequency in spontaneously firing neurons. Moreover, the 5-HT reuptake blockers citalopram and fluvoxamine mimicked the excitatory action of exogenous 5-HT. The citalopram-induced excitation was reduced by each of the selective 5-HT2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 antagonists. These observations support the hypothesis of an endogenous serotonergic tone modulating cholinergic function. Interestingly, constitutive activity of the 5-HT2C receptor has been shown to inhibit in vivo dopamine release in the rat striatum (De Deurwaerdere et al, 2004).

5-HT-Dependent Membrane Depolarization/Inward Current

A 5-HT-dependent membrane depolarization has been observed in a variety of neuronal subtypes in different brain regions, involving various ionic mechanisms (Chapin and Andrade, 2001; Chapin et al, 2002; Xiang et al, 2005; for a review, see Hoyer et al, 2002). This observation suggests an important role for 5-HT in modulating neuronal excitability in several brain areas. Our data show that 5-HT depolarizes the cell membrane and increases the firing rate of the recorded neurons.

In principle, a depolarization may be due to an increase in excitatory transmission. However, blocking synaptic transmission produced little effect on 5-HT-induced inward currents or membrane depolarization, suggesting that postsynaptic, not presynaptic, mechanisms are responsible for 5-HT-induced excitatory response. Thus, 5-HT-induced cell depolarization and increase in firing frequency might be caused by the inhibition of K+ currents, or increase of a cationic conductance. Several lines of evidence argue for a closure of K+ conductance by 5-HT in striatal cholinergic interneurons. First, 5-HT application induced an increase in input resistance. Second, the estimated reversal potential of the 5-HT-induced current was close to the K+ equilibrium potential and was shifted to less negative values by increasing the extracellular K+ concentration. Third, the K+ channel blocker Ba2+ significantly reduced the amplitude of the 5-HT-induced current.

Of note, 5-HT has already been reported to exert an excitatory effect by suppressing K+ conductances in other striatal neuronal subtypes (Stefani et al, 1990), as well as in nucleus accumbens neurons, subthalamic nucleus neurons, and cortical pyramidal neurons (North and Uchimura, 1989; Zhang, 2003; Xiang et al, 2005). In particular, in agreement with our data on striatal cholinergic interneurons, in other neuronal populations the excitatory responses to 5-HT2C receptor activation have been reported to be mediated by the closing of K+ channels (Hsiao et al, 1997; Xiang et al, 2005).

Among K+ channels, an involvement of both Kir and Kleak has been reported in the 5-HT-induced excitation. A closure of Kleak channels was shown to mediate the 5-HT-induced depolarization in dorsal vagal neurons (Hopwood and Trapp, 2005) and to be involved in the response of trigeminal and spinal cord motoneurons to 5-HT (Hsiao et al, 1997; Kjaerulff and Kiehn, 2001). In caudal raphe and nucleus accumbens and in motoneurons of the spinal cord, 5-HT has been reported to reduce Kir conductance (North and Uchimura, 1989; Bayliss et al, 1997; Kjaerulff and Kiehn, 2001). Interestingly, IKir is involved in the regulation of the spontaneous firing activity of striatal cholinergic interneurons by counteracting a prominent HCN conductance (Wilson, 2005). Furthermore, Kleak conductance participate in the modulation of membrane potential in this neuronal population (Takeshita et al, 1996). Our data suggest a role of Kir channels in mediating I5-HT. Indeed, the comparison between the 5-HT-sensitive current recorded after HCN channel blockade by either ZD 7288 or Cs+, suggests that 5-HT acts on Kir channels. The residual Cs+-insensitive K+ conductance might be carried by Kleak channels. The identification of the additional cationic conductance activated by 5-HT needs further investigation (Hsiao et al, 1997).

5-HT has been reported to exert a modulatory effect on Ih in different neuronal types. Both facilitatory and inhibitory actions have been reported (McCormick and Pape, 1990; Li et al, 1993; Zhang, 2003). 5-HT7 receptor was shown to facilitate Ih through a cAMP-mediated mechanism (Chapin and Andrade, 2001), whereas in ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons, 5-HT2 receptor activation has been reported to reduce Ih through a PKC-dependent mechanism (Liu et al, 2003). In striatal cholinergic interneurons, we observed an inhibitory effect of 5-HT on Ih. Interestingly, activation of either 5-HT2, 5-HT6 or 5-HT7 receptor was involved in the 5-HT-mediated reduction of Ih. In cholinergic interneurons, the excitatory effect of 5-HT, mediated both by a closing of K+-selective channels and an increase of cation conductance, might be counteracted by the 5-HT-induced inhibitory action on Ih, in a complex interplay as observed in the regulation of spontaneous firing activity (Wilson, 2005).

Pharmacological Characterization of the Receptor Subtype

Currently, 14 5-HT receptors have been identified and grouped into seven classes (5-HT1 to 5-HT7). Among 5-HT receptors, only 5-HT3 is a ligand-gated ion channel, whereas the other receptors belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. The striatum expresses a variety of 5-HT receptors: 5-HT1B and 5-HT1E (Bruinvels et al, 1994), 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C (Ward and Dorsa, 1996), 5-HT3 (Blandina et al, 1989; Rondé and Nichols, 1998), 5-HT4 (Jakeman et al, 1994; Waeber et al, 1994; Gerald et al, 1995; Patel et al, 1995), and 5-HT6 (Ruat et al, 1993; Ward and Dorsa, 1996; Gerard et al, 1997). The striatal expression of 5-HT7 is controversial (Vizuete et al, 1997; Martin-Cora and Pazos, 2004). The diversity of receptor subtypes matches the complexity of effects exerted by 5-HT on its target cells. In the basal ganglia, 5-HT receptors belonging to the 5-HT2C or 5-HT4 class have been reported to mediate the 5-HT-induced excitation of subthalamic nucleus and substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons (Rick et al, 1995; Xiang et al, 2005). Several studies have demonstrated, within the striatum, a high level of expression of 5-HT2 receptors (Ward and Dorsa, 1996) and the highest levels of 5-HT6 mRNA (Ruat et al, 1993; Branchek and Blackburn, 2000). Interestingly, a double-label in situ hybridization study reported that 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, and 5-HT6 receptors colocalize within the striatum either in enkephalin- or in substance P-containing spiny neurons (Ward and Dorsa, 1996). Our electrophysiological and PCR data demonstrate the expression of 5-HT2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 receptors in striatal cholinergic interneurons, where each of them contributes to the depolarization/inward current induced by 5-HT. These findings suggest a regional specificity in the pattern of 5-HT receptor subtypes expression.

Transduction Pathways

With the exception of the ionotropic 5-HT3 receptor, the remaining classes of 5-HT receptors are coupled to Gi/o, Gq or Gs proteins. In particular, 5-HT6 and 5-HT7 receptors have been reported to be positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase activation through Gs protein, whereas the 5-HT2 class of serotonergic receptors is coupled to Gq protein and PLC activation (Sebben et al, 1994). Accordingly, our pharmacological analysis shows that blockade of either adenylyl cyclase or PLC activity reduces the 5-HT-induced response in cholinergic interneurons. The excitatory action of 5-HT seems to be independent of protein kinase activity, as previously reported in other neuronal types (Larkman and Kelly, 1997; Chapin et al, 2002; Chapin and Andrade, 2001).

Thus, multiple pathways may be available for the modulation of HCN and K+ conductance by 5-HT in striatal cholinergic interneurons. Indeed, both HCN and Kleak channels are modulated by cytosolic cAMP levels, making them potential mediators of 5-HT6 and 5-HT7 receptor action (Pape, 1996; Siegelbaum et al, 1982). Moreover, 5-HT2 receptors have been reported to reduce Ih through a PKC-dependent mechanism (Liu et al, 2003), and PLC has been shown to mediate the suppression of IKir in nucleus basalis neurons (Takano et al, 1996).

Functional Implication

The serotonin reuptake inhibitors are widely used for the treatment of depression. However, this class of drugs has been reported to produce extrapyramidal effects, particularly akathisia, dystonia, and parkinsonism (Leo, 1996; Pina Latorre et al, 2001). The mechanisms underlying such adverse effects are unknown although they are likely linked to a serotonergic effect within the basal ganglia structures.

Striatal cholinergic transmission is a key element not only to the control of voluntary movement, but also to the clinical manifestations of movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (Kaneko et al, 2000; Raz et al, 2001). Notably, in vivo recordings from TANs in primates have shown that MPTP treatment induces an oscillatory electrical activity, in a frequency range that overlaps the range of the tremor frequencies (Raz et al, 2001). Thus, it might be postulated that the excitatory effect produced by 5-HT on cholinergic interneurons might represent, at least to some extent, a plausible determinant for the extrapyramidal side effects induced by 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, by promoting intrastriatal release of acetylcholine. This is in agreement with the evidence that 5-HT indeed stimulates acetylcholine release in the striatum (Bianchi et al, 1989). Hence, modulating striatal cholinergic signaling might prove useful to the pharmacological treatment of these movement disorders.