Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Oncogenomics
  • Published:

A comprehensive study of chromosome 16q in invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinoma using array CGH

Abstract

We analysed chromosome 16q in 106 breast cancers using tiling-path array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). About 80% of ductal cancers (IDCs) and all lobular cancers (ILCs) lost at least part of 16q. Grade I (GI) IDCs and ILCs often lost the whole chromosome arm. Grade II (GII) and grade III (GIII) IDCs showed less frequent whole-arm loss, but often had complex changes, typically small regions of gain together with larger regions of loss. The boundaries of gains/losses tended to cluster, common sites being 54.5–55.5 Mb and 57.4–58.8 Mb. Overall, the peak frequency of loss (83% cancers) occurred at 61.9–62.9 Mb. We also found several ‘minimal’ regions of loss/gain. However, no mutations in candidate genes (TRADD, CDH5, CDH8 and CDH11) were detected. Cluster analysis based on copy number changes identified a large group of cancers that had lost most of 16q, and two smaller groups (one with few changes, one with a tendency to show copy number gain). Although all morphological types occurred in each cluster group, IDCs (especially GII/GIII) were relatively overrepresented in the smaller groups. Cluster groups were not independently associated with survival. Use of tiling-path aCGH prompted re-evaluation of the hypothetical pathways of breast carcinogenesis. ILCs have the simplest changes on 16q and probably diverge from the IDC lineage close to the stage of 16q loss. Higher-grade IDCs probably develop from low-grade lesions in most cases, but there remains evidence that some GII/GIII IDCs arise without a GI precursor.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes DM, Millis RR, Gillett CE, Ryder K, Skilton D, Fentiman IS et al. (2004). Endocr Relat Cancer 11: 85–96.

  • Berx G, Cleton-Jansen AM, Nollet F, de Leeuw WJ, van de Vijver M, Cornelisse C et al. (1995). EMBO J 14: 6107–6115.

  • Berx G, Cleton-Jansen AM, Strumane K, de Leeuw WJ, Nollet F, van Roy F et al. (1996). Oncogene 13: 1919–1925.

  • Buerger H, Otterbach F, Simon R, Schafer KL, Poremba C, Diallo R et al. (1999). J Pathol 189: 521–526.

  • Cleton-Jansen AM . (2002). Breast Cancer Res 4: 5–8.

  • Cleton-Jansen AM, Buerger H, Haar N, Philippo K, van de Vijver MJ, Boecker W et al. (2004). Genes Chromosomes Cancer 41: 109–116.

  • Cleton-Jansen AM, Callen DF, Seshadri R, Goldup S, McCallum B, Crawford J et al. (2001). Cancer Res 61: 1171–1177.

  • Cleton-Jansen AM, Moerland EW, Pronk JC, van Berkel CG, Apostolou S, Crawford J et al. (1999). Br J Cancer 79: 1049–1052.

  • Cooper LS, Gillett CE, Patel NK, Barnes DM, Fentiman IS . (1999). Cancer 86: 2053–2058.

  • Crawford J, Ianzano L, Savino M, Whitmore S, Cleton-Jansen AM, Settasatian C et al. (1999). Genomics 56: 90–97.

  • Devilee P, Cleton-Jansen AM, Cornelisse CJ . (2001). Trends Genet 17: 569–573.

  • Dorion-Bonnet F, Mautalen S, Hostein I, Longy M . (1995). Genes Chromosomes Cancer 14: 171–181.

  • Douglas EJ, Fiegler H, Rowan A, Halford S, Bicknell DC, Bodmer W et al. (2004). Cancer Res 64: 4817–4825.

  • Droufakou S, Deshmane V, Roylance R, Hanby A, Tomlinson I, Hart IR . (2001). Int J Cancer 92: 404–408.

  • Elston CW, Ellis IO . (1991). Histopathology 19: 403–410.

  • Fiegler H, Carr P, Douglas EJ, Burford DC, Hunt S, Scott CE et al. (2003). Genes Chromosomes Cancer 36: 361–374.

  • Frengen E, Rocca-Serra P, Shaposhnikov S, Taine L, Thorsen J, Bepoldin C et al. (2000). Genomics 70: 273–285.

  • Hwang ES, Nyante SJ, Yi Chen Y, Moore D, DeVries S, Korkola JE et al. (2004). Cancer 100: 2562–2572.

  • Jain AN, Tokuyasu TA, Snijders AM, Segraves R, Albertson DG, Pinkel D . (2002). Genome Res 12: 325–332.

  • Kern SE . (2002). Cancer Biol Ther 1: 571–581.

  • Korsching E, Packeisen J, Helms MW, Kersting C, Voss R, van Diest PJ et al. (2004). Br J Cancer 90: 1422–1428.

  • Millis RR, Barnes DM, Lampejo OT, Egan MK, Smith P . (1998). Eur J Cancer 34: 548–553.

  • Nishizaki T, Chew K, Chu L, Isola J, Kallioniemi A, Weidner N et al. (1997). Int J Cancer 74: 513–517.

  • Pandis N, Idvall I, Bardi G, Jin Y, Gorunova L, Mertens F et al. (1996). Int J Cancer 66: 191–196.

  • Quon KC, Berns A . (2001). Genes Dev 15: 2917–2921.

  • Roylance R, Droufakou S, Gorman P, Gillett C, Hart IR, Hanby A et al. (2003). J Pathol 200: 53–58.

  • Roylance R, Gorman P, Hanby A, Tomlinson I . (2002). J Pathol 196: 32–36.

  • Roylance R, Gorman P, Harris W, Liebmann R, Barnes D, Hanby A et al. (1999). Cancer Res 59: 1433–1436.

  • Santarosa M, Ashworth A . (2004). Biochim Biophys Acta 1654: 105–122.

  • Sharp AJ, Locke DP, McGrath SD, Cheng Z, Bailey JA, Vallente RU et al. (2005). Am J Hum Genet 77: 78–88.

  • Tomlinson IP, Lambros MB, Roylance RR . (2002). Genes Chromosomes Cancer 34: 349–353.

  • Tsuda H, Callen DF, Fukutomi T, Nakamura Y, Hirohashi S . (1994). Cancer Res 54: 513–517.

  • Watson JE, Doggett NA, Albertson DG, Andaya A, Chinnaiyan A, van Dekken H et al. (2004). Oncogene 23: 3487–3494.

  • Whitmore SA, Crawford J, Apostolou S, Eyre H, Baker E, Lower KM et al. (1998). Genomics 50: 1–8.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to colleagues at the Sanger Institute Microarray Facility for array printing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Roylance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roylance, R., Gorman, P., Papior, T. et al. A comprehensive study of chromosome 16q in invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinoma using array CGH. Oncogene 25, 6544–6553 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209659

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209659

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links