Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Puma*Mcl-1 interaction is not sufficient to prevent rapid degradation of Mcl-1

Abstract

Although Puma (p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis) was known as a principal mediator of cell death in response to diverse apoptotic signals, the molecular mechanism underlying its proapoptotic regulation remains largely uncharacterized. Here we reported that myeloid cell leukemia-1 (Mcl-1), an antiapoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family with a rapid turnover rate, interacts with Puma. The Puma/Mcl-1 interaction was verified by both yeast two-hybrid assay and co-immunoprecipation studies. Their binding sites were mapped to BH3 (Bcl-2 homology) domain of Puma and BH1 domain of Mcl-1, respectively. Mcl-1 and Puma was shown to colocalize at the mitochondria by immunostaining. The level of Mcl-1 was increased when coexpressed with Puma, indicating Puma is able to stabilize Mcl-1. Puma binding to Mcl-1 via its BH3 domain is the prerequisite for this effect, which is further supported by the finding that Puma mutant lacking BH3 domain no longer promotes Mcl-1 protein stability. This Puma-enhanced Mcl-1 stabilization was validated in vivo under nonoverexpression conditions. We also showed that BH1 domain is essential for Mcl-1 to inhibit Puma-induced apoptosis, since Mcl-1 mutant lacking BH1 domain completely abrogates its protective function. In addition, we concluded that binding of Puma to BH1 domain of Mcl-1 is necessary, but not sufficient to prevent rapid degradation of Mcl-1. In addition to PEST (proline, glutamic acid, serine, and threonine) and BH1 domain, some additional degradation signal is expected to reside in the C-terminal region of Mcl-1. In conclusion, our results provide the first evidence that the interaction between Mcl-1 and Puma may represent a novel mechanism by which Mcl-1 prevents apoptosis by increasing its stability through binding to Puma.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akgul C, Moulding DA, White M and Edwards SW . (2000). FEBS Lett., 478, 72–76.

  • Chen L, Willis SN, Wei A, Smith BJ, Fletcher JI, Hinds MG, Colman PM, Day CL, Adams JM and Huang DC . (2005). Mol. Cell, 17, 393–403.

  • Chittenden T, Flemmington C, Houghton AB, Ebb RG, Gallo GJ, Elangovan B, Chinnadurai G and Lutz RJ . (1995). EMBO J., 14, 5589–5596.

  • Clarke AR, Purdie CA, Harrison DJ, Morris RG, Bird CC, Hooper ML and Wyllie AH . (1993). Nature, 362, 849–852.

  • Derenne S, Monia B, Dean NM, Taylor JK, Rapp M-J, Harousseau J-L, Bataille R and Amiot M . (2002). Blood, 100, 194–199.

  • Fujise K, Zhang D, Liu J-L and Yeh E . (2000). J. Biol. Chem., 275, 39458–39465.

  • Han J, Flemington C, Houghton AB, Gu Z, Zambetti GP, Lutz RJ, Zhu L and Chittenden T . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 11318–11323.

  • Han J, Sabbatini P, Perez D, Rao L, Mohda D and White E . (1996). Genes Dev., 10, 461–477.

  • Jeffers JR, Parganas E, Lee Y, Yang C, Wang J, Brennan J, MacLean KH, Han J, Chittenden T, IhIe JN, McKinnon PJ, Cleveland JL and Zambetti GP . (2003). Cancer Cell, 4, 321–328.

  • Kozopas KM, Yang T, Buchan HL, Zhou P and Craig RW . (1993). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 3516–3520.

  • Laney JD and Hochstrasser M . (1999). Cell, 97, 427–430.

  • Li P, Nijhawan D, Budihardjo I, Srinivasula SM, Ahmad M, Alnemri ES and Wang X . (1997). Cell, 91, 479–489.

  • Lowe SW, Schmitt EM, Smith SW, Osborne BA and Jacks T . (1993). Nature, 362, 847–849.

  • Moulding DA, Giles RV, Spiller DG, White MR, Tidd DM and Edwards SW . (2000). Blood, 96, 1756–1763.

  • Nakano K and Vousden KH . (2001). Mol. Cell, 7, 683–694.

  • Nijhawan D, Fang M, Traer E, Zhong Q, Gao W, Du F and Wang X . (2003). Genes Dev., 17, 1475–1486.

  • Opferman JT, Letai A, Beard C, Sorcinelli MD, Ong CC and Korsmeyer SJ . (2003). Nature, 426, 671–676.

  • Prives C and Hall PA . (1999). J. Pathol., 187, 112–126.

  • Reynolds JE, Li J, Craig RW and Eastman A . (1996). Exp. Cell Res., 225, 430–436.

  • Reynolds JE, Yang T, Qian L, Jenkinson JD, Zhou P, Eastman A and Craig RW . (1994). Cancer Res., 54, 6348–6352.

  • Rich T, Allen RL and Wyllie AH . (2000). Nature, 407, 777–783.

  • Rogers S, Wells R and Rechsteiner M . (1986). Science, 234, 364–368.

  • Sambrook J and Russell DW . (2000). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt CA, Fridman JS, Yang M, Baranov E, Hoffman RM and Lowe SW . (2002). Cancer Cell, 1, 289–298.

  • Unkila M, McColl KS, Thomenius MJ, Heiskanen K and Distelhorst CW . (2001). J. Biol. Chem., 276, 39132–39137.

  • Villunger A, Michalak EM, Coultas L, Mullauer F, Bock G, Ausserlechner MJ, Adams JM and Strasser A . (2003). Science Published online September 18, 10.1126/science.1090072.

  • Vogelstein B, Lane D and Levine AJ . (2000). Nature, 408, 307–310.

  • Vousden KH and Lu X . (2002). Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2, 594–604.

  • Yang T, Buchan HL, Townsend KJ and Craig RW . (1996). J. Cell Physiol., 166, 523–536.

  • Yang T, Kozopas KM and Craig RW . (1995). J. Cell Biol., 128, 1173–1184.

  • Yin X-M, Oltvai ZN and Korsmeyer SJ . (1994). Nature, 369, 321–323.

  • Yoon J-H, Werneburg NW, Higuchi H, Canbay AE, Kaufmann SH, Akgul C, Edwards SW and Gores GJ . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 6500–6505.

  • Yu J, Wang Z, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B and Zhang L . (2003). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 1931–1936.

  • Yu J, Zhang L, Hwang PM, Kinzler KW and Vogelstein B . (2001). Mol. Cell, 7, 673–682.

  • Zhan Q, Bieszczad CK, Bae I, Fornace Jr AJ and Craig RW . (1997). Oncogene, 14, 1031–1039.

  • Zhou P, Qian L, Bieszczad CK, Noelle R, Binder M, Levy NB and Craig RW . (1998). Blood, 92, 3226–3239.

  • Zhou P, Qian L, Kozopas KM and Craig RW . (1997). Blood, 89, 630–643.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Professor Bert Vogelstein for Puma cDNA, Puma wild type and Puma knockout HCT116 cell lines. We also thank Dr Lin Zhang for his constructive suggestion. This research was supported by a 973 grant (2002CB713702) from Ministry of Science and Technology of China; grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (90208027, 30370308 and 30121001) and a grant SBS/SUG/22/04 (to Wu Mian) from School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mian Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mei, Y., Du, W., Yang, Y. et al. Puma*Mcl-1 interaction is not sufficient to prevent rapid degradation of Mcl-1. Oncogene 24, 7224–7237 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208873

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208873

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links