Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Report
  • Published:

An essential role of Pak1 phosphorylation of SHARP in Notch signaling

Abstract

The p21-activated kinases (Paks), an evolutionarily conserved family of serine/threonine kinases, play an important role in cytoskeletal reorganization in mammalian cells. The Notch signaling pathway plays an important role in the determination of cell fate/differentiation in a number of organs. Notch signaling is a complex process, and the mechanism by which Notch regulates multiple cellular processes is intriguing. The expression of both Notch and Pak1 has been shown to be deregulated in several human cancers. Using yeast two-hybrid screening, we identified SHARP, one of the Notch signaling components, as a Pak1-interacting protein. We found that SHARP is a physiologic interacting substrate of Pak1, and that this interaction enhances SHARP-mediated repression of Notch target genes. Pak1 phosphorylation sites in SHARP were mapped to Ser3486 and Thr3568 within the SHARP repression domain. Mutation of Pak1 phosphorylation sites in SHARP, inhibition of Pak1 functions by a Pak1-autoinhibitory fragment (amino acids 83–149), or expression of Pak1-specific siRNA interfered with SHARP-mediated repression of Notch target reporter gene activation. These results demonstrate that Pak1–SHARP interaction plays an essential role in enhancing the corepressor functions of SHARP, thereby modulating Notch signaling in human cancer cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes CJ, Vadlamudi RK, Mishra SK, Jacobson RH, Li F and Kumar R . (2003). Nat. Struct. Biol., 10, 622–628.

  • Beatus P and Lendahl U . (1998). J. Neurosci. Res., 54, 125–136.

  • Bokoch GM . (2003). Annu. Rev. Biochem., 72, 743–781.

  • Daniels RH, Hall PS and Bokoch GM . (1998). EMBO J., 17, 754–764.

  • Galasinski SC, Resing KA, Goodrich JA and Ahn NG . (2002). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 19618–19626.

  • Giniger E . (1998). Neuron, 20, 667–681.

  • Hayashi K, Ohshima T and Mikoshiba K . (2002). Mol. Cell. Neurosci., 20, 579–594.

  • Hsieh JJ, Zhou S, Chen L, Young DB and Hayward SD . (1999). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 23–28.

  • Ishaq M, DeGray G and Natarajan V . (2003). J. Biol. Chem., 278, 39296–39302.

  • Iso T, Kedes L and Hamamori Y . (2003). J. Cell. Physiol., 194, 237–255.

  • Kao HY, Ordentlich P, Koyano-Nakagawa N, Tang Z, Downes M, Kintner CR, Evans RM and Kadesch T . (1998). Genes Dev., 12, 2269–2277.

  • Li F, Adam L, Vadlamudi RK, Zhou H, Sen S, Chernoff J, Mandal M and Kumar R . (2002). EMBO Rep., 3, 767–773.

  • Li Z, Hannigan M, Mo Z, Liu B, Lu W, Wu Y, Smrcka AV, Wu G, Li L, Liu M, Huang CK and Wu D . (2003). Cell, 114, 215–227.

  • Manser E, Leung T, Salihuddin H, Zhao ZS and Lim L . (1994). Nature, 367, 40–46.

  • Miele L and Osborne B . (1999). J. Cell. Physiol., 181, 393–409.

  • Nikolic M, Chou MM, Lu W, Mayer BJ and Tsai LH . (1998). Nature, 395, 194–198.

  • Ohtsuka T, Ishibashi M, Gradwohl G, Nakanishi S, Guillemot F and Kageyama F . (1999). The EMBO J, 18, 2196–2207.

  • Oswald F, Kostezka U, Astrahantseff K, Bourteele S, Dillinger K, Zechner U, Ludwig L, Wilda M, Hameister H, Knochel W, Liptay S and Schmid RM . (2002). EMBO J., 21, 5417–5426.

  • Schweisguth F . (2004). Curr. Biol., 14, R129–R138.

  • Shi Y, Downes M, Xie W, Kao HY, Ordentlich P, Tsai CC, Hon M and Evans RM . (2001). Genes Dev., 15, 1140–1151.

  • Thiel DA, Reeder MK, Pfaff A, Coleman TR, Sells MA and Chernoff J . (2002). Curr. Biol., 12, 1227–1232.

  • Vadlamudi RK and Kumar R . (2003). Cancer Metast. Rev., 22, 385–393.

  • Zhou S and Hayward SD . (2001). Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 6222–6232.

  • Zhou Y, Gross W, Hong SH and Privalsky ML . (2001). Mol. Cell. Biochem., 220, 1–13.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr D Wu for providing pSuper-EGFP-Pak1-siRNA, Dr Ronald Evans for SHARP expression plasmid, Dr Ronald M Schmid for RBP-Jk-VP16, pGa981/6 luc, Notch 1 del E and Dr Ryoichiro Kageyama for Hes-1 promoter-luc reporter. This study was supported by NIH Grants 90970 and 80066 (RK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rakesh Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vadlamudi, R., Manavathi, B., Singh, R. et al. An essential role of Pak1 phosphorylation of SHARP in Notch signaling. Oncogene 24, 4591–4596 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208672

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208672

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links