Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Oncogenomics
  • Published:

Gene expression differences between the microsatellite instability (MIN) and chromosomal instability (CIN) phenotypes in colorectal cancer revealed by high-density cDNA array hybridization

An Erratum to this article was published on 06 November 2002

This article has been updated

Abstract

Two distinct pathways of tumorigenesis exist in sporadic colorectal cancer. The microsatellite instability pathway (MIN), which is characterized by widespread microsatellite instability due to aberrant mismatch repair machinery, accounts for 15% of all sporadic colorectal cancers. The chromosomal instability (CIN) phenotype, which accounts for 85% of sporadic colorectal cancers, is characterized by gross chromosomal lesions but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We have addressed differences in gene expression between the MIN and CIN colorectal cancer phenotypes in vitro by the use of high density cDNA filters to compare gene expression patterns between MIN and CIN colorectal cancer cell-lines yielding a panel of 73 consistently differentially expressed genes. Nine of these genes were subjected to confirmatory analysis by independent methods, of which six were confirmed as being differentially expressed; PLK, RanBP2 and CCNA2 were overexpressed in CIN lines while BTF3, H2AZ and PTPD1 were overexpressed in MIN lines. These six genes are involved in diverse processes, such as maintenance of chromatin architecture, DNA-damage checkpoint and cell cycle regulation, which may contribute to the CIN and MIN phenotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Badie C, Itzhaki JE, Sullivan MJ, Carpenter AJ, Porter AC . 2000 Mol. Cell. Biology 20: 2358–2366

  • Bardelli A, Cahill DP, Lederer G, Speicher MR, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C . 2001 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5770–5775

  • Bronner CE, Baker SM, Morrison PT, Warren G, Smith LG, Lescoe MK, Kane M, Earabino C, Lipford J, Lindblom A, TannergÃ¥rd P, Bollag RJ, Godwin AR, Ward DC, Nordenskjöld M, Fishel R, Kolodner R, Liskay RM . 1994 Nature 368: 258–261

  • Cahill DP, Lengauer C, Yu J, Riggins GJ, Willson JK, Markowitz SD, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B . 1998 Nature 392: 300–303

  • Druck T, Kastury K, Hadaczek P, Podolski J, Toloczko A, Sikorski A, Ohta M, LaForgia S, Lasota J, McCue P, Lubinski J, Huebner K . 1995 Cancer Res. 55: 5348–5353

  • Eshleman JR, Casey G, Kochera ME, Sedwick WD, Swinler SE, Veigl ML, Willson JK, Schwartz S, Markowitz SD . 1998 Oncogene 17: 719–725

  • Fishel R, Lescoe MK, Rao MR, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Garber J, Kane M, Kolodner R . 1993 Cell 75: 1027–1038

  • Heinen CD, Richardson D, White R, Groden J . 1995 Cancer Res. 55: 4797–4799

  • Juan LJ, Shia WJ, Chen MH, Yang WM, Seto E, Lin YS, Wu CW, Kakinoki YJ . 2000 J. Biol. Chem. 275: 20436–20443

  • Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B . 1996 Cell 87: 159–170

  • Lal A, Lash AE, Altschul SF, Velculescu V, Zhang L, McLendon RE, Marra MA, Prange C, Morin PJ, Polyak K, Papadopoulos N, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, Strausberg RL, Riggins GJ . 1999 Cancer Res. 59: 5403–5407

  • Ouspenski II, Mueller UW, Matynia A, Sazer S, Elledge SJ, Brinkley BR . 1995 J. Biol Chem. 270: 1975–1978

  • Parsons R, Myerof LL, Liu B, Willson JK, Markowitz SD, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B . 1995 Cancer Res. 55: 5548–5550

  • Partanen S . 1996 Anticancer Res. 16: 943–946

  • Paulovich AG, Toczyski DP, Hartwell LH . 1997 Cell 88: 315–321

  • Sambrook J, Fritch EL, Maniatis T . 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza RF, Appel R, Yin J, Wang S, Smolinski KN, Abraham JM, Zou TT, Shi YQ, Lei J, Cottrell J, Cymes K, Biden K, Simms L, Leggett B, Lynch PM, Frazier M, Powell SM, Harpaz N, Sugimura H, Young J, Meltzer SJ . 1996 Nat Genet. 14: 255–257

  • Strand M, Prolla TA, Liskay RM, Petes TD . 1993 Nature 365: 274–276

  • Wolf G, Elez R, Doermer A, Holtrich U, Ackermann H, Stutte HJ, Altmannsberger HM, Rubsamen-Waigmann H, Strebhardt K . 1997 Oncogene 14: 543–549

  • Zhang L, Zhou W, Velculescu VE, Kern SE, Hruban RH, Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW . 1997 Science 276: 1268–1272

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Pat Vaughan (Department of Biochemistry, University College, Cork) for assistance with phosphorimaging. We thank P Hassell for helping with the coding of GeneMatch v1.0. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Cancer Research Advancement Board of the Irish Cancer Society, The Health Research Board (Ireland) & The Research Committee of the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David T Croke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunican, D., McWilliam, P., Tighe, O. et al. Gene expression differences between the microsatellite instability (MIN) and chromosomal instability (CIN) phenotypes in colorectal cancer revealed by high-density cDNA array hybridization. Oncogene 21, 3253–3257 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205431

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205431

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links