Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Degradation of the E7 human papillomavirus oncoprotein by the ubiquitin-proteasome system: targeting via ubiquitination of the N-terminal residue

Abstract

The E7 oncoprotein of the high risk human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16), which is etiologically associated with uterine cervical cancer, is a potent immortalizing and transforming agent. It probably exerts its oncogenic functions by interacting and altering the normal activity of cell cycle control proteins such as p21WAF1, p27KIP1 and pRb, transcriptional activators such as TBP and AP-1, and metabolic regulators such as M2-pyruvate kinase (M2-PK). Here we show that E7 is a short-lived protein and its degradation both in vitro and in vivo is mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Interestingly, ubiquitin does not attach to any of the two internal Lysine residues of E7. Substitution of these residues with Arg does not affect the ability of the protein to be conjugated and degraded; in contrast, addition of a Myc tag to the N-terminal but not to the C-terminal residue, stabilizes the protein. Also, deletion of the first 11 amino acid residues stabilizes the protein in cells. Taken together, these findings strongly suggest that, like MyoD and the Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) transforming Latent Membrane Protein 1 (LMP1), the first ubiquitin moiety is attached linearly to the free N-terminal residue of E7. Additional ubiquitin moieties are then attached to an internal Lys residue of the previously conjugated molecule. The involvement of E7 in many diverse and apparently unrelated processes requires tight regulation of its function and cellular level, which is controlled in this case by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 7
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antinore MJ, Birrer MJ, Patel D, Nader L and McCance DJ. . 1996 EMBO J. 15: 1950–1960.

  • Arbeit JM, Munger K, Howley PM and Hanahan D. . 1993 Am. J. Pathol. 142: 1187–1197.

  • Arroyo M, Bagchi S and Raychaudhuri P. . 1993 Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 6537–6546.

  • Auewarakul P, Gissmann L and Cidarregui A. . 1994 Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 8250–8258.

  • Aviel S, Winberg G, Masucci M and Ciechanover A. . 2000 J. Biol. Chem. 275: 23491–23499.

  • Blumenfeld N, Gonen H, Mayer A, Smith CE, Siegel NR, Schwartz AL and Ciechanover A. . 1994 J. Biol. Chem. 269: 9574–9581.

  • Boissel J-P, Kasper TJ and Bunn FH. . 1988 J. Biol. Chem. 263: 8443–8449.

  • Boyer SN, Wazer DE and Band V. . 1996 Cancer Res. 56: 4620–4624.

  • Bradford MM. . 1976 Anal. Biochem. 72: 248–254.

  • Breitschopf K, Bengal E, Ziv T, Admon A and Ciechanover A. . 1998 EMBO J. 17: 5964–5973.

  • Chen LP, Ashe S, Singhal MC, Galloway DA, Hellstrom I and Hellstrom KE. . 1993 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 6523–6527.

  • Crook T, Morgenstern JP, Crawford L and Banks L. . 1989 EMBO J. 8: 513–519.

  • Davies R, Hicks R, Crook T, Morris J and Vousden K. . 1993 J. Virol. 67: 2521–2528.

  • Funk J, Waga S, Harry J, Espling E, Stillman B and Galloway D. . 1997 Genes Dev. 11: 2090–2100.

  • Govers R, ten-Broeke T, van-Kerkhof P, Schwartz AL and Strous GJ. . 1999 EMBO J. 18: 28–36.

  • Greenhalgh DA, Wang XJ, Rothnagel JA, Eckhardt JN, Quintanilla MI, Barber JL, Bundman DS, Longley MA, Schlegel R and Roop DR. . 1994 Cell Growth Differ. 5: 667–675.

  • Hawley-Nelson P, Vousden KH, Hubbert NL, Lowy DR and Schiller JT. . 1989 EMBO J. 8: 3905–3910.

  • Hershko A, Heller H, Elias S and Ciechanover A. . 1983 J. Biol. Chem. 258: 8206–8214.

  • Hershko H and Heller H. . 1985 Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 128: 1079–1086.

  • Hershko A and Rose IA. . 1987 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 1829–1833.

  • Hu TH, Ferril SC, Snider AM and Barbosa MS. . 1995 Int. J. Oncol. 6: 167–174.

  • Huang S, Elliott RC, Liu P-S, Koduri RK, Weickmann JL, Lee J-H, Blair LC, Ghosh-Dastidar RA, Bradshaw RA, Bryan KM, Einarson B, Kendall RL, Kolacz KH and Saito K. . 1987 Biochemistry 26: 8242–8246.

  • Jörnvall H. . 1975 J. Theor. Biol. 55: 1–12.

  • Johnston NL and Cohen RE. . 1991 Biochemistry 30: 7514–7522.

  • Kanda T, Furuno A and Yoshiike KJ. . 1988 J. Virol. 62: 610–613.

  • Kornitzer D and Ciechanover A. . 2000 J. Cell. Physiol. 182: 1–11.

  • Munger K, Phelps WC, Bubb V, Howley PM and Schlegel R. . 1989 J. Virol. 63: 4417–4421.

  • Orian A, Gonen H, Bercovich B, Fajerman I, Eytan E, Israël A, Mercurio F, Iwai K, Schwartz AL and Ciechanover A. . 2000 EMBO J. 19: 2580–2591.

  • Pan H and Griep AE. . 1994 Genes Dev. 8: 1285–1299.

  • Phelps WC, Yee CL, Munger K and Howley PM. . 1988 Cell 53: 539–547.

  • Polevoda B, Norbeck J, Takakura H, Blomberg A and Sherman F. . 1999 EMBO J. 18: 6155–6168.

  • Scheffner M, Werness BA, Huibregtse JM, Levine A and Howley PM. . 1990 Cell 63: 1129–1136.

  • Selvey LA, Dunn LA, Tindle RW, Park DS and Frazer IH. . 1994 J. Gen. Virol. 75: 1647–1653.

  • Sheaff RJ, Singer JD, Swanger J, Smitherman M, Roberts JM and Clurman BE. . 2000 Mol. Cell 5: 403–410.

  • Varshavsky A. . 1996 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 12142–12149.

  • Voges D, Zwickl P and Baumeister W. . 1999 Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68: 1015–1068.

  • Yu H and Kopito RR. . 1999 J. Biol. Chem. 274: 36852–36858.

  • Zerfass-Thome K, Zwerschke W, Mannhardt B, Tindle R, Botz J and Jansen-Durr P. . 1996 Oncogene 13: 2323–2330.

  • Zwerschke W, Mazurek S, Massimi P, Banks L, Eigenbrodt E and Jansen-Durr P. . 1999 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 1291–1296.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from the Israel Cancer Society, a TMR grant from the European Community, the Foundation for Promotion of Research at the Technion, and a research grant administered by the Vice President of the Technion for Research (to A Ciechanover), the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF; to A Ciechanover and AL Schwartz), the German-Israeli Cooperation Project (DIP) and the Israel Science Foundation founded by the Israeli Academy of Sciences and Humanities - Centers of Excellence Program (to A Ciechanover and M Oren), the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF; to A Ciechanover and M Scheffner). Purchasing of the ABI 310 autosequencer was supported partially by a grant from the Israel Science Foundation founded by the Israeli Academy of Sciences and Humanities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reinstein, E., Scheffner, M., Oren, M. et al. Degradation of the E7 human papillomavirus oncoprotein by the ubiquitin-proteasome system: targeting via ubiquitination of the N-terminal residue. Oncogene 19, 5944–5950 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203989

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203989

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links