Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Normal ambulatory blood pressure: a clinical practice-based comparison of two recently published definitions

Abstract

The European Society of Hypertension (ESH) has issued guidelines for the detection and treatment of hypertension. According to these guidelines, normal 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) is defined as lower than 125/80 mmHg. Another publication of ESH recommendations for blood pressure (BP) measurement defines normal awake and asleep blood pressure as lower than 135/85 and 120/70 mmHg, respectively. Our aim was to investigate the compatibility of these two recently proposed ABP cutoffs in clinical practice. We analysed 1495 consecutive ABP measurements. In all, 56% of the subjects were female; age 58±16 years; body mass index 27±4 kg/m2; clinic BP 151±22/84±13 mmHg. Two-thirds were treated for hypertension, and 11% for diabetes. Subjects were classified as having normal 24-h BP if the corresponding value was <125/80 mmHg. Normal awake–sleep BP was diagnosed if awake BP was <135/85 mmHg and sleep BP was <120/70 mmHg. Concordance between the cutoffs was found in 93% of the subjects. Among the 7% discordant subjects, 4.5% were hypertensive applying the 24 h, but not awake–sleep, BP values, whereas only 2.5% were hypertensive according to awake–sleep, but not 24 h, BP values (P<0.005). In Conclusion, in real-life ABP measurement, a good agreement was found between two recently issued ABP normality definitions. However, some subjects are classified as hypertensive only according to one of these methods, more often by the 24-h cutoff of 125/80. This discordance may be significant in large-scale clinical BP monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mancia G et al. Ambulatory blood pressure normality: results from the PAMELA study. J Hypertens 1995; 13: 1377–1390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sega R et al. Ambulatory and home blood pressure normality in the elderly: data from the PAMELA population. Hypertension 1997; 30: 1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ohkubo T et al. Reference values for 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring based on a prognostic criterion: the Ohasama Study. Hypertension 1998; 32: 255–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chobanian AV et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–2572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O'Brien E et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 821–848.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 2003 European Society of Hypertension–European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1011–1053.

  7. Perk G, Mekler J, Bursztyn M . Ambulatory pulse pressure is a relatively sleep independent variable. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 723–728.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Owens P, Atkins N, O'Brien E . Diagnosis of white coat hypertension by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension 1999; 34: 267–272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I Z Ben-Dov.

Additional information

Conflicts of interest: none.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Dov, I., Ben-Arie, L., Mekler, J. et al. Normal ambulatory blood pressure: a clinical practice-based comparison of two recently published definitions. J Hum Hypertens 19, 565–567 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001866

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001866

Keywords

Search

Quick links