Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Home blood pressure measurement and its relationship with blood pressure control in a large selected hypertensive population

Abstract

Despite the impressive increase of home blood pressure monitoring (BPM) among hypertensive patients over the last few years, a limited number of studies have analysed the rate of home BPM and its relationship with target blood pressure (BP) control, in representative samples of the hypertensive population. The objectives of the study were first to evaluate the prevalence of home BPM in a large selected group of treated hypertensive patients referred to our outpatient hypertension hospital clinic. Second, to assess the rate of satisfactory clinic BP control in patients with or without familiarity with home BPM. In all, 1350 consecutive hypertensive patients who attended our hypertension centre during a period of 12 months and were regularly followed up by the same medical team were included in the study. After informed consent all patients underwent the following procedures: (1) accurate medical history (implemented by a structured questionnaire on demographic and clinical characteristics, including questions concerning home BPM); (2) physical examination; (3) clinic BP measurement; (4) routine examinations; and (5) standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. A total of 897 patients (66%) out of 1350 (687 men, 663 women, age 58.6±12.3 years, mean clinic BP 141±16/87±9 mmHg ) were regularly practising home BPM. In this group of patients, home BPM was associated with a significantly greater rate of satisfactory BP control (49.2 vs 45.6%, P<0.01). Patients performing home BPM were more frequently men (54 vs 46%, P<0.02 ) younger (average age 57.8±12.0 vs 60.3±12.7 years , P<0.001) and with a higher educational level (defined by more than 8 years of school, 71 vs 55%, P<0.05) than their counterparts. There were no significant differences in duration of hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, obesity, smoking, diabetes, associated cardiovascular diseases, left ventricular hypertrophy and compliance with drug treatment. This study demonstrates that: (1) home BPM is widely performed by hypertensive patients managed in a hypertension hospital clinic; (2) this practice is associated with a significantly higher rate of clinic BP control; and (3) age, male gender and educational level influence the adoption of home BPM.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collins R et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet 1990; 335: 827–838.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration. Effects of ACE-inhibitors, calcium antagonists and blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials. Lancet 2000; 355: 1955–1965.

  3. Menotti A et al. On behalf of the Gubbio Study Research Group. Impact of the Gubbio population study on community control of blood pressure and hypertension. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 843–850.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansson L, Llooyd A, Anderson P, Kopp Z . Excess morbidity and cost failure to achieve targets blood pressure control in Europe. Blood Pressure 2002; 11: 35–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanson-Fisher RW, Clover K . Compliance in the treatment of hypertension. A need for action. Am J Hypertens 1995; 8: 82S–88S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Costa FV . Compliance with antihypertensive treatment. Clin Exper Hypertens 1996; 18: 463–472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Girvin B, Johnston GD . The implications of noncompliance with antihypertensive medication. Drugs 1996; 52: 186–195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Consoli SM et al. Interactive electronic teaching (ISIS): has the future started? J Hum Hypertens 1996; 10(Suppl 1): 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zweifler AJ et al. Training students in education of the hypertensive patient. Enhanced performance after a simulated instructor (SPI) based exercise. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 610–613.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuspidi C et al. Improvement of patients' knowledge by a single educational meeting on hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15: 57–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moller DS et al. Telemonitoring of home blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients. Blood Pressure 2003; 12: 56–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O'Brien E, Beevers G, Lip GHY . ABC of hypertension. Part IV. Automated sphygmomanometer:self blood pressure measurement. BMJ 2001; 322: 1167–1170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Asmar R, Zanchetti A . on behalf of the Organizing Committee and participants. Guidelines for the use of self-blood pressure monitoring: a summary report on the first international consensus conference. J Hypertens 2000; 18: 493–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O'Brien E et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 821–848.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reims H, Fossum E, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S . Home blood pressure monitoring. Current knowledge and directions for future research. Blood Press 2001; 10: 271–287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Imai Y et al. and the Participants of the First International Consensus Conference on Blood Pressure Self-Measurement Prognostic significance of self-measurements of blood pressure. Blood Press Monit 2000; 5: 137–142.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jula A, Puukka P, Karanko H . Multiple clinic and home blood pressure measurements vs ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension 1999; 34: 261–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mule G et al. Value of home blood pressure as predictor of target organ damage in mild arterial hypertension. J Cardiovasc Risk 2002; 9: 123–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hozawa A et al. Prognosis of isolated systolic and diastolic hypertension as assessed by self measurement of blood pressure at home: the Ohasama study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 3301–3306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parati G, Asmar R, Stergiou GS . Self blood pressure monitoring at home by wrist devices: a reliable approach. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 573–578.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Krecke HJ, Lutkes P, Maiwald M . Patient assessment of self-measurement of blood pressure: results of a telephone survey in Germany. J Hypertens 1996; 14: 323–326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krecke HJ, Fleischmann C, Bokmann M . Distribution and acceptance of blood pressure self-measurement in the Hamburg area. Scheweiz Rundschau Med Praxis 1989; 78: 1336–1342.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Guidelines Subcommittee. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for Management of Hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 151–183.

  24. Schillaci G et al. Improved electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 714–719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. Guidelines Committee. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1011–1053.

  26. Eckert S, Gleichmann S, Gleichmann U . Blood pressure self-measurement in upper arm and in wrist for treatment control of arterial hypertension compared to ABPM. Z Kardiol 1996; 85(suppl 3): 109–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cuspidi C et al. “To better know hypertension”: educational meetings for hypertensive patients. Blood Pressure 2000; 9: 255–259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yarows SA, Julius S, Pickering TG . Home blood pressure monitoring. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 1251–1257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Soghikian K et al. Home blood pressure monitoring. Effects on use of medical services and medical care cost. Med Care 1992; 30: 855–865.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zanke KB, Feagan BG, Mahon JL et al. A randomized study comparing a patient-directed hypertension management strategy with usual office-based care. Am J Hypertens 1997; 10: 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Edmonds D et al. Does self-measurement of blood pressure improve patient compliance in hypertension. J Hypertens 1985; 3(suppl 1): 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ayman D, Goldshine AD . Blood pressure determinations by patients with essential hypertension: the difference between clinic and home readings before treatment. Am J Med Sci 1940; 200: 465–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nordmann A et al. Reliability of patients measuring blood pressure at home: prospective observational study. BMJ 1999; 319: 1172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Cuspidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuspidi, C., Meani, S., Fusi, V. et al. Home blood pressure measurement and its relationship with blood pressure control in a large selected hypertensive population. J Hum Hypertens 18, 725–731 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001737

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001737

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links