Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Validation of the Finometer device for measurement of blood pressure in black women

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 18, pages 79–84 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

The improved Finapres apparatus, known as the Fino-meter, measures finger blood pressure noninvasively on a beat-to-beat basis and gives waveform measurements similar to intra-arterial recordings. The Finometer measures brachial pressure and corrects for finger pressure accordingly. It also corrects for the hydrostatic height of the finger with respect to the heart level. The objective was to validate the Finometer according to the revised British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol and the criteria of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). We carried out a main validation test using a subject group of 102 black women, which was also divided into smaller groups, namely 24 hypertensives, 25 obese normotensive and 35 lean normotensive women. Finometer and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure (BP) measurements were taken early in the morning before breakfast, after the subjects stayed overnight in a research unit. Within the whole subject group, the Finometer satisfied the AAMI criteria for accuracy and achieved an overall A/B grading according to the BHS criteria. The sphygmomanometer measurements were 128±20/78±12 mmHg compared to 130±20/78±11 mmHg for the Finometer. The average differences between the mercury sphygmomanometer and Finometer readings for systolic and diastolic BP were, respectively, −1.83±6.8 and 0.88±7.5. Systolic readings of the Finometer device differed by less than 5 mmHg for 64%, by less than 10 mmHg for 86% and differed by less than 15 mmHg for 96% of all readings. A total of 63% of all diastolic readings of the Finometer by less than 5 mmHg, 85% by less than 10 mmHg and 94% of all readings differed by less than 15 mmHg. On the basis of these results, the Finometer device satisfied the validation criteria of AAMI and received an A/B grading according to the BHS protocol. It can therefore be recommended for measurements in the clinical set-up and for research purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sleight P . Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension 1985; 7: 163–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. In't Veld AJ et al. Measurement of heart rate and blood pressure variability in man. Proceedings of the Two Satellite Symposia to the Seventh Meeting of the European Society of Hypertension. Van Zuiden Communications, 1995.

  3. Huisman HW et al. Prolactin, testosterone and cortisol as possible markers of changes in cardiovascular function associated with urbanization. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16: 829–835.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schutte AE et al. Dietary risk markers that contribute to the aetiology of hypertension in black South African children: the THUSA BANA study. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 29–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Imholz BPM, Wieling W, Van Montfrans GA, Wesseling KH . Fifteen years experience with finger arterial pressure monitoring: assessment of the technology. Cardiovasc Res 1998; 38: 605–616.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McAuley D, Silke B, Farrel S . Reliability of blood pressure determination with the Finapres with altered physiological states or pharmacodynamic conditions. Clin Auton Res 1997; 7: 179–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Silke B, McAuley D . Accuracy and precision of blood pressure determination with the Finapres: an overview using re-sampling statistics. J Hum Hypertens 1998; 12: 403–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American national standard. Electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. ANSI/AAMI SP 10-1992. AAMI: Arlington, VA, 1993, p 40.

  9. Bos WJ et al. The reliability of noninvasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement in patients with both hypertension and vascular disease. Am J Hypertens 1992; 5: 529–535.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dorlas JC et al. Effects of peripheral vasoconstriction on the blood pressure in the finger, measured continuously by a new non-invasive method (the Finapres). Anaesthesiology 1985; 62: 342–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guelen I et al. Finometer, finger pressure measurements with the possibility to reconstruct brachial pressure. Blood Press Monit 2003; 8: 27–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gizdulich P et al. Finapres tracking of systolic pressure and baroreflex sensitivity improved by waveform filtering. J Hypertens 1996; 14: 243–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Brien E et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993; 11(Suppl 2): S43–S63.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wesseling KH, Settels JJ, De Wit B . The measurement of continuous finger arterial pressure noninvasively in stationary subjects. In: Schmidt TH, Dembroski TM, Blümchen G (eds). Biological Factors in Cardiovascular Disease. Springer: Berlin, 1986, pp 355–375.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Imholz BPM . The brachial to finger pressure difference: are effects of modifiers of pulse wave distortion detectable among subjects? In: Man in't Veld AJ, van Montfrans GA, Langewouters GJ, Lie KI, Mancia G (ed). Measurement of Heart Rate and Blood Pressures Variability in Man. Proceedings of the Two Satellite Symposia to the Seventh Meeting of the European Society of Hypertension, 7 June 1995. Van Zuiden Communications: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organization. International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 151–183.

  17. Norton K, Olds T . Anthropometrica: a Textbook of Body Measurement for Sports and Health Courses. UNSW Press: Sydney, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Livi R, Teghini L, Cagnoni S, Scarpelli PT . Simultaneous and sequential same-arm measurements in the validation studies of automated blood pressure measuring devices. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 1228–1231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pesola GR, Pesola HR, Nelson MJ, Westfal RE . The normal difference in bilateral indirect blood pressure recordings in normotensive individuals. Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19: 43–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. StatSoft, Inc. STATISTICA for Windows (Computer program manual). StatSoft, Inc.: Tulsa, OK, 2000.

  21. Bland JM, Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. O'Brien E et al. Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ 2001; 322: 531–536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Langewouters GJ, Settels JJ, Roelandt R, Wesseling KH . Why use Finapres or Portapres rather than intra-arterial or intermittent non-invasive techniques of blood pressure measurement? J Med Eng Technol 1998; 22: 37–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants of the POWIRS-study, as well as Sr C Lessing and Mrs CF Scholtz. We are also grateful for the funding of this project, provided by the South African National Research Foundation, Medical Research Council and Research Focus Area 9.1 of the PU for CHE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School for Physiology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education, South Africa

    A E Schutte, H W Huisman, J M van Rooyen, N T Malan & R Schutte

Authors
  1. A E Schutte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H W Huisman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J M van Rooyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N T Malan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R Schutte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A E Schutte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schutte, A., Huisman, H., van Rooyen, J. et al. Validation of the Finometer device for measurement of blood pressure in black women. J Hum Hypertens 18, 79–84 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001639

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001639

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links