Abstract
IN a letter published in NATURE of March 6, Prof. Fowler pointed out that a series of “parallelisms” that we gave of lines in the spectra of neon and hydrogen were probably coincidences, and could not be taken as evidence of identity. We are sorry that we did not make our meaning plainer, in our letter in NATURE for February 27, for we did not mean that the lines we compared in the two spectra were identical. The numbers we used were by Watson, and both spectra were measured from plates produced by the same instrument, and, of course, measured by the same person; thus experimental error was eliminated so far as possible. We were, however, in hope that possibly some similarity in atomic complexity might be argued from this “parallelism.” But on talking the matter over with Prof. Fowler, whose knowledge of the subject is far greater than ours, we see that the evidence is not sufficient to justify any such assumption of similarity in the atomic complexity of these two elements, and we must therefore with regret abandon the idea.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
COLLIE, J., PATTERSON, H. The Spectra of Neon, Hydrogen, and Helium. Nature 91, 32–33 (1913). https://doi.org/10.1038/091032b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/091032b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.