Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Value of body fat mass vs anthropometric obesity indices in the assessment of metabolic risk factors

International Journal of Obesity volume 30, pages 475–483 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the value of body fat mass (%FM) to indirect measures of general (body mass index (BMI)) and central adiposity (waist circumference (WC); waist-to-height ratio (WC/ht)) for the prediction of overweight- and obesity-related metabolic risk in a study population with a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MSX).

Methods:

BMI, WC, WC/ht, body composition (by air-displacement plethysmography) and metabolic risk factors: triglycerides, cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), uric acid, systolic blood pressure (BPsys), insulin resistance by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured in 335 adults (191 women, 144 men; mean age 53 ±13.9 years, prevalence of MSX 30%).

Results:

When compared with BMI and WC, %FM showed weaker associations with metabolic risk factors, except for CRP and BPsys in men. In women, HDL-C and HOMA-IR showed the closest correlations with BMI. For all other risk factors, WC or WC/ht were the best predictors in both sexes. Differences in the strength of correlations between an obesity index and different risk factors exceeded the differences observed between all obesity indices within one risk factor. In stepwise multiple regression analyses, WC/ht was the main predictor of metabolic risk in both sexes combined. However, analysis of the area under receiver operating characteristic curves for prediction of the prevalence of ⩾2 component traits of the MSX revealed a similar accuracy of all obesity indices.

Conclusions:

At the population level, measurement of body FM has no advantage over BMI and WC in the prediction of obesity-related metabolic risk. Although measures of central adiposity (WC, WC/ht) tended to show closer associations with risk factors than measures of general adiposity, the differences were small and depended on the type of risk factor and sex, suggesting an equivalent value of methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Obesity – Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic: Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity. World Health Organization: Geneva, 1998.

  2. Executive summary of the third report of the national cholesterol education program expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult treatment panel III). JAMA 2002; 258: 2486–2497.

  3. Wang JJ, Hu G, Miettinen ME, Tuomilehto J . The metabolic syndrome and incident diabetes: assessment of four suggested definitions of the metabolic syndrome in a Chinese population with high post-prandial glucose. Horm Metab Res 2004; 36: 708–715.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodman E, Daniels SR, Morrison JA, Huang B, Dolan LM . Contrasting prevalence of and demographic disparities in the World Health Organization and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definitions of metabolic syndrome among adolescents. J Pediatr 2004; 145: 445–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L, Nyyssonen K, Punnonen K, Tuomainen TP, Valkonen VP et al. C-reactive protein and the development of the metabolic syndrome and diabetes in middle-aged men. Diabetologia 2004; 47: 1403–1410; (Epub 2004 July 28).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lorenzo C, Okoloise M, Williams K, Stern MP, Haffner SM, San Antonio Heart Study. The metabolic syndrome as predictor of type 2 diabetes: the San Antonio heart study. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 3153–3159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Svendsen OL . Should measurement of body composition influence therapy for obesity? Acta Diabetol 2003; 40: S250–S253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Richelsen B, Pedersen SB . Associations between different anthropometric measurements of fatness and metabolic risk parameters in non-obese, healthy, middle-aged men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995; 19: 169–174.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tai ES, Ho SC, Fok AC, Tan CE . Measurement of obesity by anthropometry and bioelectric impedance analysis: correlation with fasting lipids and insulin resistance in an Asian population. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1999; 28: 445–450.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakanishi N, Nakamura K, Suzuki K, Matsuo Y, Tatara K . Associations of body mass index and percentage body fat by bioelectrical impedance analysis with cardiovascular risk factors in Japanese male office workers. Ind Health 2000; 38: 273–279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Warne DK, Charles MA, Hanson RL, Jacobsen LTH, McCane DR, Knowler WC et al. Comparison of body size measurements as predictors of NIDDM in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 435–439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tulloch-Reid MK, Williams DE, Looker HC, Hanson RL, Knowler WC . Do measures of body fat distribution provide information on the risk of type 2 diabetes in addition to measures of general obesity? – Comparison of anthropometric predictors of type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 2556–2561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagaya T, Yoshida H, Takahashi H, Matsuda Y, Kawai M . Body mass index (weight/height2) or percentage body fat by bioelectrical impedance analysis: which variable better reflects serum lipid profile? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 771–774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lahmann PH, Lissner L, Gullberg B, Berglund G . A prospective study of adiposity and all-cause mortality: the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. Obes Res 2002; 10: 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De Lorenzo F, Mukherjee M, Kadziola Z, Suleiman S, Kakkar VV . Association of overall adiposity rather than body mass index with lipids and procoagulant factors. Thromb Haemost 1998; 80: 603–606.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang J . Waist circumference: a simple, inexpensive, and reliable tool that should be included as part of physical examinations in the doctor's office. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 78: 902–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lofren I, Herron K, Zern T, West K, Patalay M, Shachter NS et al. Waist circumference is a better predictor than body mass index for coronary heart disease risk in overweight premenopausal women. J Nutr 2004; 134: 1071–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R . Waist circumference and not body mass index explains obesity-related health risk. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 79: 379–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bigaard J, Tjonneland A, Thomsen BL, Overvad K, Heitman BL, Sorensen TIA . Waist circumference BMI, smoking, and mortality in middle-aged men and women. Obes Res 2003; 11: 895–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bigaard J, Thomsen BL, Tjonneland A . Does waist circumference alone explain obesity-related health risk? Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80: 790–791; (author reply 791–792).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hara M, Saitou E, Iwata F, Okada T, Harada K . Waist-to-height ratio is the best predictor of cardiovascular disease risk factors in Japanese schoolchildren. J Atheroscler Thromb 2002; 9: 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsieh SD, Yoshinaga H, Muto T . Waist-to-height ratio, a simple and practical index for assessing central fat distribution and metabolic risk in Japanese men and women. Int J Obes Relat Disord 2003; 27: 610–616.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hsieh SD, Muto T . The superiority of waist-to-height ratio as an anthropometric index to evaluate clustering of coronary risk factors among non-obese men and women. Prev Med 2005; 40: 216–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sayeed MA, Mahtab H, Latif ZA, Khanam PA, Ahsan KA, Banu A et al. Waist-to-height ratio is a better obesity index than body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio for predicting diabetes, hypertension and lipidemia. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2003; 29: 1–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Danielzik S, Czerwinski-Mast M, Langnäse K, Dilba B, Müller MJ . Parental overweight, socioeconomic status and high birth weight are the major determinants of overweight and obesity in 5–7y-old children: baseline data of the Kiel Obesity Prevention Study. Int J Obes Relat Disord 2004; 28: 1494–1502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bosy-Westphal A, Mast M, Eichhorn C, Becker C, Kutzner D, Heller M et al. Validation of air-displacement plethysmography for estimation of body fat mass in healthy elderly subjects. Eur J Nutr 2003; 42: 207–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Siri WE . Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: Brozek J, Henschel A (eds). Techniques for Measuring Body Composition. National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC, 1961, pp 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC . Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985; 28: 412–419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH . Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 973–979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Handbook of Diagnostic Tests, 3rd edn. Lipincott Williams: Philadelphia, PA, 2003.

  31. Eng J . ROC analysis: Web-Based Calculator for ROC Curves. Johns Hopkins University: Baltimore. Available from: http://www.rad.jhmi.edu/roc.

  32. Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, Heo M, Jebb SA, Murgatroyd PR, Sakamoto Y . Healthy percentage of body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72: 694–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tanaka S, Togashi K, Rankinen T, Perusse L, Leon AS, Rao DC et al. Is adiposity at normal body weight relevant for cardiovascular disease risk? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 176–183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Piers LS, Soares MJ, Frandsen SL, O'Dea K . Indirect estimates of body composition are useful for groups but unreliable in individuals. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 1145–1152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vague J . The degree of masculine differentiation of obesities: a factor determining predisposition to diabetes, atherosclerosis, gout and uric calculous disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1956; 4: 20–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Seidell JC, Bjorntorp P, Sjostrom L, Sannerstedt R, Krotkiewski M, Kvist H . Regional distribution of muscle and fat mass in men – new insight into the risk of abdominal obesity using computed tomography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1989; 13: 289–303.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bjorntorp P . Abdominal fat distribution and disease: an overview of epidemiological data. Ann Med 1992; 24: 15–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pouliot MC, Despres JP, Lemieux S, Moorjani S, Bouchard C, Tremblay A et al. Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 460–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chan DC, Watts GF, Barrett PH, Burke V . Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as predictors of adipose tissue compartments in men. QJM 2003; 96: 441–447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Onat A, Avci GS, Barlan MM, Uyarel H, Uzunlar B, Sansoy V . Measures of abdominal obesity assessed for visceral adiposity and relation to coronary risk. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28: 1018–1025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang J, Thornton JC, Bari S, Williamson B, Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB et al. Comparison of waist circumference measured at four sites. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77: 379–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bray GA . Risks of obesity. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2003; 32: 787–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Maison P, Byrne CD, Hales CN, Day NE, Wareham NJ . Do different dimensions of the metabolic syndrome change together? Evidence supporting obesity as the central feature. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1758–1763.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Palaniappan L, Carnethon MR, Wang Y, Hanley AJG, Fortmann SP, Haffner SM et al. Predictors of the incident metabolic syndrome in adults. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 788–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Henriksson KM, Lindblad U, Agren B, Nilsson-Ehle P, Rastam L . Associations between body height, body composition and cholesterol levels in middle-aged men. The coronary risk factor study in southern Sweden (CRISS). Eur J Epidemiol 2001; 17: 521–526.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Heitmann BL, Erikson H, Ellsinger BM, Mikkelsen KL, Larsson B . Mortality associated with body fat, fat-free mass and body mass index among 60-year-old Swedish men – a 22-year follow-up. The study of men born in 1913. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 33–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Allison DB, Zhu SK, Plankey M, Faith MS, Heo M . Differential associations of body mass index and adiposity with all-cause mortality among men in the first and second National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES I and NHANESII) follow-up studies. Int J Obes Relat Disord 2002; 26: 410–416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bigaard J, Frederiksen K, Tjonneland A, Thomsen BL, Overvad K, Heitmann BL et al. Body fat and fat-free mass and all-cause mortality. Obes Res 2004; 12: 1042–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bigaard J, Frederiksen K, Tjonneland A, Thomsen BL, Overvad K, Heitmann BL et al. Waist and hip circumferences and all-cause mortality: usefulness of the waist-to-hip ratio? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28: 741–747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Seidell JC, Han TS, Feskens EJ, Lean ME . Narrow hips and broad waist circumferences independently contribute to increased risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Intern Med 1997; 242: 401–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Lissner L, Bjorkelund C, Heitmann BL, Seidell JC, Bergtsson C . Larger hip circumference independently predicts health and longevity in a Swedish female cohort. Obes Res 2001; 9: 644–646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Seidell JC, Perusse L, Despres JP, Bouchard C . Waist and hip circumferences have independent and opposite effects on cardiovascular disease risk factors: the Quebec Family Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 74: 315–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Snijder MB, Dekker JM, Visser M, Yudkin JS, Stehouwer CD, Bouter LM et al. Larger thigh and hip circumferences are associated with better glucose tolerance: the Hoorn Study. Obes Res 2003; 11: 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Terry RB, Wood PD, Haskell WL, Stefanick ML, Krauss RM . Regional adiposity patterns in relation to lipids, lipoprotein cholesterol, and lipoprotein subfraction mass in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989; 68: 191–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Snijder MB, Zimmet PZ, Visser M, Dekker JM, Seidell JC, Shaw JE . Independent and opposite associations of waist and hip circumferences with diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia: the AusDiab Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28: 402–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Allison DB, Paultre F, Goran MI, Poehlman ET, Heymsfield SB . Statistical considerations regarding the use of ratios to adjust data. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995; 19: 644–652.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Cnop M, Landchild MJ, Vidal J, Havel PJ, Knowles NG, Carr DR et al. The concurrent accumulation of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous fat explains the association between insulin resistance and plasma leptin concentrations: distinct metabolic effects of two fat compartments. Diabetes 2002; 51: 1005–1015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the BMFT-project ‘Kieler Netzwerk; Krankheitsprävention durch Ernährung: Nahrungsfette und Stoffwechsel- Genvariabilität, -regulation, -funktion und funktionelle Lebensmittelinhaltsstoffe: Eine Familien-Pfadstudie im Rahmen der Kieler Adipositaspräventionsstudie (KOPS) Teilprojekt 6.1.2’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Humanernährung und Lebensmittelkunde, Christian-Albrechts Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    A Bosy-Westphal, C Geisler, S Onur, O Korth & M J Müller

  2. Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig, Abt. Klinische Chemie, Kiel, Germany

    O Selberg

  3. Bundesforschungsanstalt für Ernährung und Lebensmittel, Kiel, Germany

    J Schrezenmeir

Authors
  1. A Bosy-Westphal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C Geisler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S Onur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. O Korth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. O Selberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J Schrezenmeir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M J Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M J Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bosy-Westphal, A., Geisler, C., Onur, S. et al. Value of body fat mass vs anthropometric obesity indices in the assessment of metabolic risk factors. Int J Obes 30, 475–483 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803144

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links