Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

WHO and ADA criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in relation to body mass index. Insulin sensitivity and secretion in resulting subcategories of glucose tolerance

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of body mass index (BMI) on agreement between the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the new World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and to investigate the metabolic profile of the resulting subcategories.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study

SUBJECTS: A total of 3018 subjects with no previous history of diabetes and fasting glucose <7.8 mmol/l, with a wide range of BMIs.

MEASUREMENTS: (1) Prevalence of impaired glucose regulation (IGR) and diabetes (DM) according to ADA and WHO diagnostic criteria; (2) basal and post-load insulin sensitivity and secretion, calculated on the basis of data derived from an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

RESULTS: The diagnosis according to the two classifications was concordant in 2490 subjects, discordant in 528 (452 were identified as impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 76 as DM only by means of OGTT). The disagreement increased with increasing BMI, being as high as 25.3% in subjects with BMI ≥35 kg/m2. Subjects with isolated fasting hyperglycaemia were mainly characterised by reduced insulin sensitivity and secretion in the basal state, but normal first-phase insulin secretion and moderately reduced insulin sensitivity after glucose challenge. Subjects with isolated 2 h hyperglycaemia were mainly characterised by normal basal insulin secretion and by a marked insulin resistance associated with a blunted first-phase insulin secretion after the glucose load.

CONCLUSIONS: The disagreement between ADA and WHO classifications is particularly relevant in obesity, making OGTT mandatory in these subjects. Different pathogenic mechanisms are involved in isolated fasting or post-load hyperglycaemia, possibly related to a different site of insulin resistance (hepatic vs peripheral), and/or to a different disregulation of insulin secretion (basal vs post-load). A correct identification of the underlying mechanism(s) is the rationale for future studies to detect the effectiveness of different pharmacological or behavioural approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1997 20: 1183–1197.

  2. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance Diabetes 1979 28: 1039–1057.

  3. DECODE Study Group, on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology Study Group. Will new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus change phenotype of patients with diabetes? Reanalysis of European epidemiological data Br Med J 1998 317: 371–375.

  4. Shaw JE, de Courten M, Boyko EJ, Zimmett PZ . Impact of new diagnostic criteria for diabetes on different populations Diabetes Care 1999 22: 762–766.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee ET, Howard BV, Go O, Savage PJ, Fabsitz RR, Robbins DC, Welty TK . Prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes in three America Indian populations Diabetes Care 2000 23: 181–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alberti KGMM, Zimmet PZ for the WHO Consultation . Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation Diabetes Med 1998 15: 539–553.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, de Courten M, Dowse GK, Chitson P, Gareboo H, Hemraj F, Fareed D, Tuomilehto J, Alberti KGMM . Impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance Diabetes Care 1999 22: 399–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weyer C, Bogardus C, Pratley RE . Metabolic characteristics of individuals with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance Diabetes 1999 48: 2197–2203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies MJ, Raymond NT, Day JL, Hales CN, Burden AC . Impaired glucose tolerance and fasting hyperglycaemia have different characteristics Diabetic Med 2000 17: 433–440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gimeno SGA, Ferreira SRG, Laercio JF, Iunes M, The Japanese Brazilian Diabetes Study Group. Comparison of glucose tolerance categories according to World Health Organization and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria in a population-based study in Brazil Diabetes Care 1998 21: 1889–1892.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. The DECODE Study Group: glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria . Lancet 1999 354: 617–621.

  12. Tripathy D, Carlsson M, Almgren P, Isomaa B, Taskinen M-R, Tuomi T, Groop LC . Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in relation to glucose tolerance. Lessons from the Botnia study Diabetes 2000 49: 975–980.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stumvoli M, Mitakou A, Pimenta W, Jenseen T, Yki-Jarvinen H, Van Haeften T, Renn W, Gerich J . Use of oral glucose tolerance test to assess insulin release and insulin sensitivity Diabetes Care 2000 23: 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC . Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from plasma fasting glucose and insulin concentrations in man Diabetologia 1985 28: 412–419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuda M, de Fronzo RA . Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing Diabetes Care 1999 22: 1462–1470.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cederholm J, Wibell L . Insulin release and peripheral sensitivity at the oral glucose tolerance test Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1990 10: 167–175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bonora E, Targher G, Alberriche M, Bonadonna RCM, Saggiani F, Zenere MB, Monauni T, Muggeo M . Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity: studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity Diabetes Care 2000 23: 57–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. de Fronzo R, Tobin JD, Andres R . Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance Am J Physiol 1979 237: 214–223.

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Fronzo RA. Pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes: metabolic and molecular implications for identifying diabetes genes . Diabetes Rev 1997 3: 177–269.

  20. de Fronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Simonson DC . Fasting hyperglycemia in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: contributions of excessive hepatic glucose production and impaired tissue glucose uptake Metabolism 1989 38: 387–395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz LD, Glickman MG, Rapoport S, Ferrannini E, de Fronzo RA . Splanchnic and peripheral disposal of oral glucose in man Diabetes 1983 32: 675–679.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Duncan DB . Multiple range test for correlated and heteroscedastic means Biometrics 1957 13: 164–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mannucci E, Bardini G, Ognibene A, Rotella CM . Comparison of ADA and WHO screening methods for diabetes mellitus in obese patients Diabetic Med 1999 16: 579–585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Levitt NS, Unwin NC, Bradshaw D, Kitange HM, Mbanya J-CN, Mollentze WF, Omar MAK, Motala AA, Joubert G, Masuki G, Machibya H . Application of the new ADA criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes to populations studies in sub-Saharan Africa Diabetic Med 2000 17: 381–385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dinneen SF, Maldonado D III, Leibson CL, Klee GG, Li H, Melton LJ III, Rizza RA . Effects of changing diagnostic criteria on the risk of developing diabetes Diabetes Care 1998 21: 1408–1413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G Forlani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melchionda, N., Forlani, G., Marchesini, G. et al. WHO and ADA criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in relation to body mass index. Insulin sensitivity and secretion in resulting subcategories of glucose tolerance. Int J Obes 26, 90–96 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801847

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801847

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links