Original Contribution

Am J Hypertens (2005) 18, 1415–1420; doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.05.017

Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure Promotes Achievement of Blood Pressure Target in Primary Health Care*

Laura Halme1, Risto Vesalainen1, Mika Kaaja2 and Ilkka Kantola1 HOMER (HOme MEasuRement of blood pressure) study group

  1. 1Department of Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
  2. 2Department of Pharmacy, Kuopio University, Kuopio, Finland

Correspondence: Dr. Ilkka Kantola, Turku University Hospital, Department of Medicine, 20520 Turku, Finland E-mail: ilkka.kantola@tyks.fi

*This work was supported by Pfizer Finland by provision of blood pressure measurement devices used in the study, education of the physicians and management of the program on the primary health care level.

Received 25 January 2005; Revised 3 April 2005; Accepted 9 May 2005.

Top

Abstract

Background: The majority of hypertensive patients do not reach the target blood pressure (BP). We sought to clarify whether intermittent self-monitoring of BP leads to better BP control compared to ordinary treatment in general practice.

Methods: Two hundred sixty-nine hypertensive patients participated in this multicenter, randomized, parallel-group study in primary health care. Home BP was measured in the self-monitoring (SM) group at 0, 2, 4, and 6 months, and in the control (C) group at 0 and 6 months. The participating physicians were instructed to intensify the antihypertensive therapy when needed.

Results: At the beginning, both groups had similar home BP levels (SM 143.1 plusminus 17.4/85.3 plusminus 7.4 mm Hg v C 143.9 plusminus 18.3/85.4 plusminus 7.5 mm Hg). After 6 months, there were significant decreases in systolic (P less than or equal to .0001), diastolic (P less than or equal to .0029), and pulse pressures (P less than or equal to .021) in both groups. Systolic (-7.8 plusminus 13.1 mm Hg v -4.5 plusminus 12.2 mm Hg, P = .047) and pulse pressure (-4.7 plusminus 9.0 mm Hg v -2.2 plusminus 10.0 mm Hg, P = .042) decreased significantly more than in the self-monitoring group. The decrease in diastolic pressure was similar in both groups (SM -3.1 plusminus 6.2 mm Hg v C -2.3 plusminus 8.3 mm Hg, P = not significant). The patients in the SM group reached home BP target more often than those in the C group (29% v 16%, P = .016). There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower office BP values in the SM group.

Conclusions: Self-monitoring decreased systolic and pulse pressure significantly more than ordinary treatment and promoted achievement of target BP. This was most likely due to improved patient compliance and more active treatment by the physicians. Our results suggest that home measurement is useful in the control of hypertension.

Keywords:

Home blood pressure measurement, self-monitoring of blood pressure, hypertension, primary care

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

The Price of Obstructive Sleep Apnea?Hypopnea: Hypertension and Other Ill Effects

American Journal of Hypertension News and Views

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT