Asian Journal of Andrology (2007) 9, 668–673; doi:10.1111/j.1745-7262.2007.00273.x
Outcome of repeated micro-surgical testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia
Halit Talas1, Onder Yaman1 and Kaan Aydos2
- 1Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Ankara, Ankara 06550, Turkey
- 2Research Center on Infertility, School of Medicine, University of Ankara, Ankara 06550, Turkey
Correspondence: Dr Halit Talas, Department of Urology, University of Ankara, School of Medicine, Ankara 06550, Turkey. Fax: +90-312-3112-167. E-mail: halittalas@yahoo.com
Received 25 September 2006; Accepted 8 February 2007.
Top of pageAbstract
Aim:
To evaluate the outcome of repetitive micro-surgical testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) attempts in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) cases, in relation to patients' initial testicular histology results.
Methods:
A total of 68 patients with NOA in whom mTESE had been performed in previous intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) attempts were reviewed.
Results:
Among the 68 patients with NOA, the first mTESE yielded mature sperm for ICSI in 44 (64%) (Sp+), and failed in the remaining 24 (36%) (Sp-). Following their first trial, 24 patients decided to undergo a second mTESE. Of these 24 patients, no spermatozoa were obtained in 5 patients, and Sp+ but no fertilization/pregnancy were achieved in 19. In these 24 cases, mTESE was successively repeated for two (n = 24), three (n = 4) and four (n = 1) times. The second attempt yielded mature sperm in 3/5 patients from the Sp- group and 16/19 patients from the Sp+ group. At the third and fourth trials, 4/4 and 1/1 of the original Sp+ patients were Sp+ again, respectively. Distribution of main testicular histology included Sertoli cell-only syndrome (16%), maturation arrest (22%), hypospermatogenesis (21%) and focal spermatogenesis (41%). Overall, in repetitive mTESE, 24/29 (82%) of the attempts were finally Sp+.
Conclusion:
Repeated mTESE in patients with NOA is a feasible option, yielding considerably high sperm recovery rate. In patients with NOA, mTESE may safely be repeated one or more times to increase sperm retrieval rate, as well as to increase the chance of retrieving fresh spermatozoa to enable ICSI.
Keywords:
azoospermia, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, micro-surgical testicular sperm extraction, non-obstructive azoospermiarepetitive testicular sperm extraction
Top of pageReferences
- Su LM, Palermo GD, Goldstein M, Veeck LL, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-obstructive azoospermia: Testicular hystology can predict success of sperm retrieval. J Urol 1999; 161: 112–6. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Tournaye H, Camus M, Goossens A, Liu J, Nagy P, Silber S, et al. Recent concepts in the management of infertility because of non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1995; 10 (Suppl): 115–9. | PubMed |
- Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Goossens A, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1457–60. | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Nagy P, Ubaldi F, Goossens A, Silber S, et al. Are there any predictive factors for successful testicular sperm recovery in azoospermic patients?. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 80–6. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Vernaeve V, Tournaye H, Osmanagaoglu K, Verheyen G, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with testicular spermatozoa is less successful in non-obstructive azoospermia than in obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 529–33. | Article | PubMed |
- Nicopoullos JD, Gilling-Smith C, Almeida PA, Norman-Taylor J, Grace I, Ramsay JW. Use of surgical sperm retrieval in azoospermic men: A meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 691–701. | Article | PubMed |
- World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
- Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 131–5. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Aydos K, Demirel LC, Baltaci V, Unlu C. Enzymatic digestion plus mechanical searching improves testicular sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 120: 80–6. | Article | PubMed |
- Friedler S, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Soffer Y, Komarovsky D, Ron-El R. Testicular sperm retrieval by percutaneous fine needle sperm aspiration compared with testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1488–93. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Bettella A, Ferlin A, Menegazzo M, Ferigo M, Tavolini IM, Bassi PF, et al. Testicular fine needle aspiration as a diagnostic tool in non-obstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl 2005; 7: 289–94. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Schrader M, Muller M, Straub B, Miller K. Testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic patients with gonadal germ cell tumors prior to chemotherapy: A new therapy option. Asian J Androl 2002; 4: 9–15. | PubMed |
- Ezeh UI, Moore HD, Cooke ID. Correlation of testicular sperm extraction with morphological, biophysical and endocrine profiles in men with azoospermia due to primary go-nadal failure. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3066–74. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Verheyen G, Vernaeve V, Van Landuyt L, Tournaye H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Should diagnostic sperm retrieval followed by cryopreservation for later ICSI be the procedure of choice for all patients with non-obstructive azoospermia?. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2822–30. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Amer M, Haggar SE, Moustafa T, Abd El-Naser T, Zohdy W. Testicular sperm extraction: impact of testicular histology on outcome, number of biopsies to be performed and optimal time for repetition. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 3030–4. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Miyagawa Y, Tohda A, Miura H, Nishimura K, et al. Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2924–9. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Westlander G, Rosenlund B, Soderlund B, Wood M, Bergh C. Sperm retrieval, fertilization and pregnancy outcome in repeated testicular sperm aspiration. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001; 18: 171–7. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Friedler S, Raziel A, Schachter M, Strassburger D, Bern O, Ron-El R. Outcome of first and repeated testicular sperm extraction and ICSI in patients withnon-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2356–61. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Vernaeve V, Verheyen G, Goossens A, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, Tournaye H. How successful is repeat testicular sperm extraction in patients with azoospermia?. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1551–4. | Article | PubMed |
- Vanderzwalmen P, Zech H, Birkenfeld A, Yemini M, Bertin G, Lejeune B, et al. Intracytoplasmic injection of spermatids retrieved from testicular tissue: influence of testicular pathology, type of selected spermatids and oocyte activation. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1203–13. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.