Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Career Feature
  • Published:

Career feature

The impact of gender diversity on junior versus senior biomedical scientists’ NIH research awards

Nature Biotechnology volume 42, pages 815–819 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Unearthing within-group inequality in science funding and careers highlights a new mechanism explaining the disadvantages faced by younger generations of women scientists.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The upward trends of the share of women among all doctorates awarded in the life sciences from 1985 to 2020.
Fig. 2: Gender difference in the predicted probability of holding a tenured position.
Fig. 3: Marginal effects of gender diversification on scientists’ amount of grant funding and likelihood of being funded.

References

  1. Koning, R., Samila, S. & Ferguson, J. P. Science 372, 1345–1348 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang, Y., Tian, T. Y., Woodruff, T. K., Jones, B. F. & Uzzi, B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2200841119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Teichmann, S. A., Haniffa, M. & Fisher, J. Nat. Commun. 13, 4068 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ley, T. J. & Hamilton, B. H. Science 322, 1472–1474 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marsh, H. W. et al. Rev. Educ. Res. 79, 1290–1326 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pohlhaus, J. R., Jiang, H., Wagner, R. M., Schaffer, W. T. & Pinn, V. W. Acad. Med. 86, 759–767 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandström, U. & Hällsten, M. Scientometrics 74, 175–189 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bol, T., de Vaan, M. & van de Rijt, A. Res. Policy 51, 104399 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Witteman, H. O., Hendricks, M., Straus, S. & Tannenbaum, C. Lancet 393, 531–540 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hechtman, L. A. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7943–7948 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED) https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/home (accessed 13 March 2022).

  12. Ding, W. W., Ohyama, A. & Agarwal, R. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1019–1024 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alberts, B., Kirschner, M. W., Tilghman, S. & Varmus, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5773–5777 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Blau, D. M. & Weinberg, B. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3879–3884 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Levitt, M. & Levitt, J. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6498–6503 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Stephan, P. E. & Levin, S. G. Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time (Oxford Univ. Press, 1992).

  17. Daniels, R. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 313–318 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Merton, R. K. Science 159, 56–63 (1968).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cole, J. R. & Cole, S. Am. J. Phys. 42, 923–924 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Allison, P. D. & Stewart, J. A. Am. Sociol. Rev. 39, 596–606 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Allison, P. D., Long, J. S. & Krauze, T. K. Am. Sociol. Rev. 47, 615–625 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. DiPrete, T. A. & Eirich, G. M. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32, 271–297 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bol, T., de Vaan, M. & van de Rijt, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4887–4890 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kanter, R. M. in The Gender Gap in Psychotherapy (eds Rieker, P. P. & Carmen, E. H.) 53–78 (Springer, 1977).

  25. Blickenstaff, J. C. Gend. Educ. 17, 369–386 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leahey, E., Beckman, C. M. & Stanko, T. L. Adm. Sci. Q. 61, 105–139 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Milojević, S., Radicchi, F. & Walsh, J. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12616–12623 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Freeman, R., Weinstein, E., Marincola, E., Rosenbaum, J. & Solomon, F. Science 294, 2293–2294 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Long, S. & Fox, M. F. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 21, 45–71 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sheltzer, J. M. & Smith, J. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10107–10112 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Torvik, V. I. & Smalheiser, N. R. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 3, 1–29 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Foster, J. G., Rzhetsky, A. & Evans, J. A. Am. Sociol. Rev. 80, 875–908 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mohnen, M. Manage. Sci. 68, 2513–2532 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Levin, S. G. & Stephan, P. E. Sex Roles 38, 1049–1064 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ceci, S. J. et al. Psychol. Sci. Publ. Int. 15, 75–140 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li, D. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 9, 60–92 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kozlowski, D., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R. & Monroe-White, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2113067119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Santamaría, L. & Mihaljević, H. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 4, e156 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank conference participants at the Academy of Management and Asian Innovation and Entrepreneurship Seminar for their comments and feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Lundquist College of Business, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA

    Christopher C. Liu

  2. Department of Management and Organization, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

    Beril Yalcinkaya & Waverly W. Ding

  3. Area of Management and Strategy, HKU Business School, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR

    Andy S. Back

Authors
  1. Christopher C. Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beril Yalcinkaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andy S. Back
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Waverly W. Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

This work was conducted collaboratively by all authors. C.C.L. and W.W.D. wrote and edited the paper. B.Y. and A.S.B. collected and analyzed data and participated in the writing of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Christopher C. Liu or Waverly W. Ding.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Tables 1–8

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, C.C., Yalcinkaya, B., Back, A.S. et al. The impact of gender diversity on junior versus senior biomedical scientists’ NIH research awards. Nat Biotechnol 42, 815–819 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02234-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02234-y

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing