Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Rethinking technology innovation for mental health: framework for multi-sectoral collaboration

Abstract

The impact of technology on mental health has become a core concern for researchers and practitioners from the clinical science, public health and technology sectors. One factor that influences this impact is the large gap between the silos of technologies explicitly designed as mental health support tools and the everyday technologies that inadvertently affect mental health. Here we ground our position on findings from a workshop that brought together over 60 experts and emphasize the importance of a multi-sectoral collaboration across these silos to address the complexities of technology’s impact on mental health. Our specific recommendations include a push to align stakeholders, incentives and governance, adopting person-centered and proactive mental health evaluation, and empowering users and clinicians (and their interactions) through mental health and technology literacy. We highlight sector-specific adaptations that can support greater collaborations, toward a future in which users have consistently positive interactions between technology use and their mental health.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Framework for multi-sectoral collaboration, serving as a reminder to address the unique contexts, challenges and strengths of each sector group.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engel, G. L. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 196, 129–136 (1977).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Porcari, D. E., Ricciardi, E. & Orfei, M. D. A new scale to assess technostress levels in an Italian banking context: the work-related technostress questionnaire. Front. Psychol. 14, 1253960 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson, A. et al. A review and agenda for examining how technologydriven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being. Aust. J. Manag. 45, 402–424 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khetawat, D. & Steele, R. G. Examining the association between digital stress components and psychological wellbeing: a meta-analysis. Clin. Child Family Psychol. Rev. 26, 957–974 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R. & Gladwell, V. F. Motivational, emotional and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 1841–1848 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reinecke, L. et al. Digital stress over the life span: the effects of communication load and internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments in a German probability sample. Media Psychol. 20, 115–190 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rohwer, E., Flöther, J.-C., Harth, V. & Mache, S. Overcoming the ‘dark side’ of technology—a scoping review on preventing and coping with work-related technostress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 3625 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Keles, B., McCrae, N. & Grealish, A. A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. Int. J. Adolesc. Youth 25, 79–93 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J. W. Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behav. 29, 129–156 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Viner, R. M. et al. Roles of cyberbullying, sleep, and physical activity in mediating the effects of social media use on mental health and wellbeing among young people in England: a secondary analysis of longitudinal data. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 3, 685–696 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Kiperman, S. & Howard, A. Technology hurts? Lesbian, gay and bisexual youth perspectives of technology and cyberbullying. J. School Violence 12, 27–44 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Keeffe, G. S. et al. The impact of social media on children, adolescents and families. Pediatrics 127, 800–804 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinstein, E. & Selman, R. L. Digital stress: adolescents’ personal accounts. New Media Soc. 18, 391–409 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell, K. J., Jones, L. M., Turner, H. A., Shattuck, A. & Wolak, J. The role of technology in peer harassment: does it amplify harm for youth? Psychol. Violence 6, 193–204 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alonzo, R., Hussain, J., Stranges, S. & Anderson, K. K. Interplay between social media use, sleep quality and mental health in youth: a systematic review. Sleep Med. Rev. 56, 101414 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Henzel, V. & Håkansson, A. Hooked on virtual social life. Problematic social media use and associations with mental distress and addictive disorders. PLoS ONE 16, e0248406 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Reilly, M. et al. Is social media bad for mental health and wellbeing? Exploring the perspectives of adolescents. Clin. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 23, 601–613 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scott, D. A., Valley, B. & Simecka, B. A. Mental health concerns in the digital age. Int. J. Ment. Health Addiction 15, 604–613 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsitsika, A. K. et al. Online social networking in adolescence: patterns of use in six European countries and links with psychosocial functioning. J. Adolesc. Health 55, 141–147 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Plackett, R., Blyth, A. & Schartau, P. The impact of social media use interventions on mental well-being: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e44922 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ivie, E. J., Pettitt, A., Moses, L. J. & Allen, N. B. A meta-analysis of the association between adolescent social media use and depressive symptoms. J. Affect. Disord. 275, 165–174 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, S., Liu, D., Feng Niu, G. & Longobardi, C. Active social network sites use and loneliness: the mediating role of social support and self-esteem. Curr. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00658-8 (2020).

  23. Best, P., Manktelow, R. & Taylor, B. Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: a systematic narrative review. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 41, 27–36 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Allen, K. A., Ryan, T., Gray, D. L., McInerney, D. M. & Waters, L. Social media use and social connectedness in adolescents: the positives and the potential pitfalls. Educ. Dev. Psychol. 31, 18–31 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ridout, B. & Campbell, A. J. The use of social networking sites in mental health interventions for young people: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 20, e12244 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sadagheyani, H. E. & Tatari, F. Investigating the role of social media on mental health. Ment. Health Soc. Incl. 25, 41–51 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lehtimaki, S., Martic, J., Wahl, B., Foster, K. T. & Schwalbe, N. Evidence on digital mental health interventions for adolescents and young people: systematic overview. JMIR Ment. Health 8, e25847 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Heron, K. E. & Smyth, J. M. Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br. J. Health Psychol. 15, 1–39 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Torous, J. et al. Digital mental health and COVID-19: using technology today to accelerate the curve on access and quality tomorrow. JMIR Ment. Health 7, e18848 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohr, D. C., Weingardt, K. R., Reddy, M. & Schueller, S. M. Three problems with current digital mental health research… and three things we can do about them. Psychiatr. Serv. 68, 427–429 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gooding, P. & Kariotis, T. C. Ethics and law in research on algorithmic and data-driven technology in mental health care: scoping review. JMIR Ment. Health 8, e24668 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wykes, T., Lipshitz, J. & Schueller, S. M. Towards the design of ethical standards related to digital mental health and all its applications. Curr. Treat. Options Psychiatry 6, 232–242 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Coghlan, S. et al. To chat or bot to chat: Ethical issues with using chatbots in mental health. Digit. Health 9, 20552076231183542 (2023).

  34. Floridi, L. & Cowls, J. A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1 (2019).

  35. Ong, D. C. An ethical framework for guiding the development of affectively-aware artificial intelligence. In Proc. 2021 9th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) 1–8 (IEEE, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII52823.2021.9597441

  36. Hernandez, J. et al. Guidelines for assessing and minimizing risks of emotion recognition applications. In Proc. 2021 9th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) 1–8 (IEEE, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII52823.2021.9597452

  37. Bowie-DaBreo, D., Sas, C., Sunram-Lea, S.-I. & Iles-Smith, H. A call for responsible innovation in mobile mental health: Findings from a content analysis and ethical review of the depression app marketplace. Annu. Rev. CyberTher. Telemed 18, 11–15 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Skorburg, J. A. & Yam, J. Is there an app for that?: ethical issues in the digital mental health response to COVID-19. AJOB Neurosci. 13, 177–190 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Aljedaani, B. & Babar, M. A. Challenges with developing secure mobile health applications: systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 9, e15654 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Loughlin, K., Neary, M., Adkins, E. C. & Schueller, S. M. Reviewing the data security and privacy policies of mobile apps for depression. Internet Interv. 15, 110–115 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim, J. Data brokers and the sale of Americans’ mental health data. Sanford School of Public Policy https://techpolicy.sanford.duke.edu/data-brokers-and-the-sale-of-americans-mental-health-data/ (2023).

  42. Bauer, M. et al. Smartphones in mental health: a critical review of background issues, current status and future concerns. Int. J. Bipolar Disord. 8, 2 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Larsen, M. E. et al. Using science to sell apps: evaluation of mental health app store quality claims. NPJ Digit. Med. 2, 18 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Lattie, E. G. et al. Opportunities for and tensions surrounding the use of technology-enabled mental health services in community mental health care. Adm. Policy Ment. Health 47, 138–149 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Saad, A. et al. Mobile technology assisted interventions targeting mental health among pregnant and postpartum women: a protocol for an equity focused systematic review. PLoS ONE 16, e0259474 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ennis, L., Rose, D., Denis, M., Pandit, N. & Wykes, T. Can’t surf, won’t surf: the digital divide in mental health. J. Ment. Health 21, 395–403 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Robotham, D. J., Satkunanathan, S., Doughty, L. & Wykes, T. Do we still have a digital divide in mental health? A five-year survey follow-up. J. Med. Internet Res. 18, e309 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Torous, J., Nicholas, J., Larsen, M. E., Firth, J. & Christensen, H. Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements. BMJ Ment. Health 21, 116–119 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Li, H. et al. Transition of mental health service delivery to telepsychiatry in response to COVID-19: a literature review. Psychiatric Q. 93, 181–197 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cowan, K. E., McKean, A. J., Gentry, M. T. & Hilty, D. M. Barriers to use of telepsychiatry: clinicians as gatekeepers. Mayo Clinic Proc. 94, 2510–2523 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lattie, E. G. et al. Uptake and usage of intellicare: a publicly available suite of mental health and well-being apps. Internet Interv. 4, 152–158 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Mohr, D. C. et al. IntelliCare: an eclectic, skills-based app suite for the treatment of depression and anxiety. J. Med. Internet Res. 19, e10 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Neary, M. et al. A process for reviewing mental health apps: using the One Mind Psyberguide Credibility Rating system. Digit. Health https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076211053690 (2021).

  54. Neary, M. & Schueller, S. M. State of the field of mental health apps. Cogn. Behav. Pract. 25, 531–537 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Torous, J. B. & Roberts, L. W. Needed innovation in digital health and smartphone applications for mental health: transparency and trust. JAMA Psychiatry 74, 437–438 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Anthes, E. Mental health: there’s an app for that. Nature 532, 20–23 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bzdok, D. & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. Machine learning for precision psychiatry: opportunities and challenges. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 3, 223–230 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Thieme, A., Belgrave, D. & Doherty, G. Machine learning in mental health. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 27, 1–53 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Cummins, N. et al. A review of depression and suicide risk assessment using speech analysis. Speech Commun. 71, 10–49 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang, R. et al. Tracking depression dynamics in college students using mobile phone and wearable sensing. In Proc. ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies Vol. 2, 1–26 (ACM, 2018).

  61. Park, M. J., Kim, D. J., Lee, U., Na, E. J. & Jeon, H. J. A literature overview of virtual reality (VR) in treatment of psychiatric disorders: recent advances and limitations. Front. Psychiatry 10, 505 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Riva, G., Banõs, R. M., Botella, C., Mantovani, F. & Gaggioli, A. Transforming experience: the potential of augmented reality and virtual reality for enhancing personal and clinical change. Front. Psychiatry 7, 164 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A. M. & Vierhile, M. Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment. Health 4, e19 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Vaidyam, A. N., Wisniewski, H., Halamka, J. D., Kashavan, M. S. & Torous, J. B. Chatbots and conversational agents in mental health: a review of the psychiatric landscape. Can. J. Psychiatry 64, 456–464 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Loveys, K., Antoni, M., Donkin, L., Sagar, M. & Broadbent, E. Comparing the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual human, teletherapy and an e-manual in delivering a stress management intervention to distressed adult women: pilot study. JMIR Form. Res. 7, e42390 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Laestadius, L., Bishop, A., Gonzalez, M., Illenčík, D. & Campos-Castillo, C. Too human and not human enough: a grounded theory analysis of mental health harms from emotional dependence on the social chatbot replika. New Media Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221142007 (2022).

  67. Wilson, K. et al. Exploring the use of body-worn cameras in acute mental health wards: a qualitative interview study with mental health patients and staff. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 140, 104456 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Appenzeller, Y. E., Appelbaum, P. S. & Trachsel, M. Ethical and practical issues in video surveillance of psychiatric units. Psychiatric Serv. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201900397 (2019).

  69. Simpson, A. Surveillance, CCTV and body-worn cameras in mental health care. J. Ment. Health 32, 369–372 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Anastasi, G. & Bambi, S. Utilization and effects of security technologies in mental health: a scoping review. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 32, 1561–1582 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Federal Trade Commission. FTC to ban BetterHelp from revealing consumers’ data, including sensitive mental health information, to Facebook and others for targeted advertising. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/03/ftc-ban-betterhelp-revealing-consumers-data-including-sensitive-mental-health-information-facebook (2 March 2023).

  72. Satariano, A. British ruling pins blame on social media for teenager’s suicide. The New York Times (1 October 2022).

  73. Gooding, P. Mapping the rise of digital mental health technologies: emerging issues for law and society. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 67, 101498 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Stade, E. C. et al. Large language models could change the future of behavioral healthcare: a proposal for responsible development and evaluation. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cuzvr (2023).

  75. Milton, A., Ajmani, L., DeVito, M. A. & Chancellor, S. ‘I see me here’: mental health content, community and algorithmic curation on TikTok. In Proc. 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 480 (ACM, 2023).

  76. Voigt, P. & Von dem Bussche, A. The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): a Practical Guide 1st edn., 10–5555 (Springer, 2017).

  77. Arbanas, G. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Alcoholism Psychiatry Res. 51, 61–64 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L. & Williams, J. B. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Internal Med. 16, 606–613 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W. & Löwe, B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 166, 1092–1097 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Rodden, K., Hutchinson, H. & Fu, X. Measuring the user experience on a large scale: user-centered metrics for web applications. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2395–2398 (ACM, 2010).

  81. Park, Y., Fritz, C. & Jex, S. M. Daily cyber incivility and distress: the moderating roles of resources at work and home. J. Manag. 44, 2535–2557 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Derks, D. & Bakker, A. B. Smartphone use, work-home interference, and burnout: a diary study on the role of recovery. Appl. Psychol. 63, 411–440 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Odgers, C. L. & Jensen, M. R. Annual research review: adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears and future directions. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 61, 336–348 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Dalgleish, T., Black, M. J., Johnston, D. & Bevan, A. Transdiagnostic approaches to mental health problems: current status and future directions. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 88, 179–195 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Porche, M. V., Folk, J. B., Tolou-Shams, M. & Fortuna, L. R. Researchers’ perspectives on digital mental health intervention co-design with marginalized community stakeholder youth and families. Front. Psychiatry 13, 867460 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Vial, S., Boudhraˆa, S. & Dumont, M. Human-centered design approaches in digital mental health interventions: exploratory mapping review. JMIR Ment. Health 9, e35591 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Schueller, S. M., Hunter, J. F., Figueroa, C. & Aguilera, A. Use of digital mental health for marginalized and underserved populations. Curr. Treat. Options Psychiatry 6, 243–255 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Burkett, I. An Introduction to Co-design (Knode, 2012).

  89. Bevan Jones, R. et al. Practitioner review: co-design of digital mental health technologies with children and young people. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 61, 928–940 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Baumel, A., Fleming, T. & Schueller, S. M. Digital micro interventions for behavioral and mental health gains: core components and conceptualization of digital micro intervention care. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e20631 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Schleider, J. L. & Weisz, J. R. Little treatments, promising effects? Meta-analysis of single-session interventions for youth psychiatric problems. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 56, 107–115 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Campbell, A. Single session interventions: an example of clinical research in practice. Aust. N. Z. J. Fam. Ther. 20, 183–194 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Kappelmann, N., Müller-Myhsok, B. & Kopf-Beck, J. Adapting the randomised controlled trial (RCT) for precision medicine: introducing the nested-precision RCT (npRCT). Trials 22, 13 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Ma, M. A., Gutiérrez, D. E., Frausto, J. M. & Al-Delaimy, W. K. Minority representation in clinical trials in the United States: trends over the past 25 years. Mayo Clin. Proc. 96, 264–266 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Bindman, A. B. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the development of a learning health care system. JAMA Intern. Med. 177, 909–910 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Anderson, M. & Jiang, J. Teens, Social Media and Technology 2022 (Pew Research Center, 2022); https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/08/10/teens-socialmedia-and-technology-2022/

  97. US Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. Teacher Digital Learning Guide. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2021/01/Teacher-Digital-Learning-Guide.pdf (15 October 2021).

  98. Falloon, G. From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev 2020, 1–24 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Sussman, N. & DeJong, S. M. Ethical considerations for mental health clinicians working with adolescents in the digital age. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 20, 113 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Barnett, J. E. & Kolmes, K. The practice of tele-mental health: ethical, legal and clinical issues for practitioners. Pract. Innov. 1, 53–66 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Coyne, S. M., Rogers, A. A., Zurcher, J. D., Stockdale, L. & Booth, M. Does time spent using social media impact mental health? An eight year longitudinal study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 104, 106160 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Ernala, S. K. et al. The reintegration journey following a psychiatric hospitalization: examining the role of social technologies. Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. 6, 122 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all of the workshop organizers and attendees for their invaluable contributions and discussions, as well as the Microsoft Research Summit organizers for facilitating the event and providing funding for the event. The workshop was funded by the Microsoft Research Summit program. The discussions and findings presented were shaped through a collaborative process involving diverse stakeholders, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any specific organization or company, including the workshop’s funding body. The funding organization did not have any role in the interpretation of data or writing of the report, nor in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J. Suh, S.R.P., R.L., E.H., K.S. and E.O. wrote the drafts of the manuscript. J. Suh, S.R.P. and E.H. prepared the boxes. J.A. and G.R. prepared the figure, which was later revised by the editorial office. J. Suh, S.R.P., R.L., E.H., J.A., G.R., J. Shen, J.B., A.S., P.P., L.F., C.J., Y.B., D.C.O., S.S., T.A. and M.C. participated in the thematic analysis of the workshop discussions. All authors edited, reviewed and refined all versions of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jina Suh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics

All workshop attendees were given prior notice regarding the recording of discussions during the workshop registration process. Attendees were made aware of the intention to analyze the discussions for publication and were offered the opportunity to participate in the manuscript writing process.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Mental Health thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suh, J., Pendse, S.R., Lewis, R. et al. Rethinking technology innovation for mental health: framework for multi-sectoral collaboration. Nat. Mental Health 2, 478–488 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00232-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00232-2

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing